Table 3.
Comparison of categorized sizes of the transverse and the longitudinal arch of foot in the study patients
| Transverse arch size | L/W | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | F2 | ||||
| N | % | N | % | ||
| High arch | 2 | 1.724 | 1 | 0.862 | Ch^2 = 2.6311 |
| Normal arch | 93 | 80.172 | 102 | 87.931 | df = 2 |
| Fallen arch | 21 | 18.103 | 13 | 11.207 | p = 0.2683 |
| Longitudinal arch size | KY | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | F2 | ||||
| N | % | N | % | ||
| Hollow | 60 | 51.72 | 57 | 49.14 | Ch^2 = 0.8816 |
| Normal | 15 | 12.93 | 17 | 14.65 | df = 3 |
| Fallen | 39 | 33.62 | 38 | 32.76 | p = 0.8299 |
| Flat | 2 | 1.72 | 4 | 3.45 | |
F1 foot on the operated breast side, F2 foot on the contralateral side, L/W Wejsflog index, KY Sztriter–Godunov index, p calculated probability value