Table 5.

Comparison of foot postures in the study patients depending on the type of surgical procedure within the axillary fossa lymph node system

Tested parameter	BCT + SLNB, n = 60			BCT + ALND, n = 56			Comparison F1 vs F3, F2 vs F4, statistical significance
	Foot on operated side F1, mean	Foot on contralateral side F2, mean	p	Foot on operated side F3, mean	Foot on contralateral side F4, mean	p
Lower limb load	36.38	37.43	0.1726	35.60	37.01	0.0422	p1 = 0.9080
							p2 = 0.9837
L	225.28	226.28	0.2247	224.39	225.00	0.6735	p1 = 0.9821
							p2 = 0.9491
W	86.75	87.33	0.7965	86.43	86.66	0.9850	p1 = 0.9923
							p2 = 0.9358
L/W	2.62	2.59	0.7334	2.61	2.61	0.9999	p1 = 0.9923
							p2 = 0.9763
ALPHA	8.62	8.88	0.9790	8.06	8.05	0.9999	p1 = 0.9438
							p2 = 0.8455
BETA	16.15	15.67	0.9790	15.66	15.85	0.9987	p1 = 0.9886
							p2 = 0.9994
GAMMA	15.24	16.07	0.5320	15.40	15.19	0.9866	p1 = 0.9962
							p2 = 0.6072
KY	0.28	0.27	0.9943	0.26	0.30	0.6764	p1 = 0.9887
							p2 = 0.9013
CL	52.54	51.49	0.8983	50.22	53.09	0.2584	p1 = 0.7895
							p2 = 0.9181
HW	51.16	51.47	0.9201	51.30	51.46	0.9899	p1 = 0.9988
							p2 = 1.0000
FA	59.41	60.08	0.9667	64.35	64.01	0.9958	p1 = 0.6961
							p2 = 0.8223

BCT + SLNB group undergoing BCT + SLNB surgery, BCT + ALND group undergoing BCT + ALND surgery, F1 foot on the operated breast side, F2 foot on the contralateral side, L foot length, W foot width, L/W Wejsflog index, ALPHA hallux valgus angle, BETA little toe varus angle, GAMMA heel angle, KY Sztriter–Godunov index, CL Clarke’s angle, HW heel width, WFA weighted foot area, p1 F1 vs F3, p2 F2 vs F4, p calculated probability value