Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Feb;26(2):213–225. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1508.08007

Table 1.

Biochemical and molecular biology tools for HCS: summary of their application, advantages, and potential pitfalls.

Assay tools Applications Advantages Potential pitfalls Selected References
IHC
  • Quantification of drug target proteins

  • Identification of subcellular localizations

  • Phenotypic characterization

  • Cell-ECM interaction studies

  • Detection of endogenous protein levels

  • Detection of phosphorylated proteins

  • Antibodies readily available for a multitude of antigens

  • Multiplex protein detection

  • No requirement of gene delivery

  • Laborious procedures requiring optimization

  • False positives based on antibody quality

  • Background signals from non-specific antibody binding

  • Terminal assay, not real-time

[31]
[118]
[50]
[95]
RNAi screen
  • Functional gemomics through genome-scale loss-of-function screens

  • Validation of new drug targets

  • Therapeutic drug repositioning

  • Non-terminal/invasive assay

  • RNAi libraries readily available

  • No requirement of generation of stable cell lines

  • Large-scale, phenotype-based screens

  • Variability and degree of knockdown

  • Only temporary inhibition of gene function

  • Potential non-specificity

  • Not every gene is susceptible to RNAi

[11]
[24]
[49]
[61, 62]
[9]
[78]
RGA
  • Studies for gene expression and regulation

  • Phenotypic characterization

  • Mechanism-based toxicity assays

  • Studies relating to cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions

  • Non-terminal assay

  • Compatible with time-lapse studies

  • Amenable to modifications such as signal amplification and gene delivery method

  • Sensitive, rapid, and reproducible

  • Limitation of multiplex protein detection

  • Cell-to-cell variability in expression can confound results

  • Indirect measurement of expression

  • Poor transfection efficiencies

  • Laborious procedure to generate stable cell lines

  • Reporter systems cannot accurately capture complexity of gene regulation

[39]
[6]
[23]
[27]
[68]
[46]
[47]
CRISPR-Cas9
  • Functional genomics

  • Phenotypic characterization

  • Quantification of target proteins

  • Non-terminal assay

  • Detection of endogenous protein levels

  • Fewer false signals

  • Compatible with time-lapse studies

  • Large-scale, phenotype-based screens

  • Laborious protocols for isolation of successfully targeted cells

  • Current lack of arrayed screening resources (e.g., genome-scale collections of sgRNAs)

[99]
[109]
[7]
[93]
[119]
PPI
  • Identification of protein-protein interactions

  • Identification of small-molecule-targeted pathways

  • Identification of optimal targets for a network of interest

  • Non-terminal assay

  • Compatible with time-lapse imaging

  • Detection of phosphorylated proteins

  • Robust and high specificity

  • Direct detection of molecular interactions

  • Detection of subcellular localizations and translocations of protein complexes

  • Indirect measurement

  • Requirement of stable cell lines or high transfection efficiency

  • Non-specific protein binding leading to false signals

[96]
[102]
[107]
[75]
[48]
[1]
[90]