Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 13;8(1):11–17. doi: 10.1007/s12522-008-0002-9

Table 3.

Effect of glutathione sham‐injection on the rate of embryos on various stage of development

Concentration (mM) No. of embryos (%)
n 2‐cell 4‐cell 8‐cell Morula Blastocyst
Control 25 25 (100.0) 15 (60.0) b 9 (36.0) b 5 (20.0) b 5 (20.0) b
 GSSG
  0.01 30 30 (100.0) 28 (93.3) a 21 (70.0) a 19 (63.3) a 11 (36.7) a,b
  0.02 25 25 (100.0) 19 (76.0) a,b 15 (60.0) a,b 11 (44.0) a,b 9 (36.0) a,b
  0.05 30 30 (100.0) 25 (83.3) a 15 (50.0) a,b 12 (33.3) a,b 8 (26.7) a,b
 GSH
  0.01 30 30 (100.0) 28 (93.3) a 20 (66.7) a 17 (56.7) a 14 (46.7) a
  0.02 20 20 (100.0) 16 (80.0) a,b 14 (70.0) a 10 (50.0) a 8 (40.0) a,b
  0.05 28 28 (100.0) 23 (82.1) a 19 (67.9) a 14 (50.0) a 10 (35.7) a,b

Values in parentheses indicate percentage. Data are expressed as of four replicates. Each embryo contains 0.35, 0.7 and 1.75 pg glutathione for 0.01, 0.02 and 0.05 mM treatment, respectively

a,bValues with different superscripts within the same column are significantly different (P < 0.05)