Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 26;121(5):909–926. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx161

Table 5.

Comparison of parameters, response variables and composite traits of the four indentified ideotypes

Variable Ideotype
A B C D
Parameters
Nb Leaves 39 ± 1c 41 ± 1b 44 ± 0a 41 ± 1b
Lrac int (cm) 670 ± 20a 523 ± 17c 505 ± 5c 608 ± 20b
ratio L 0.13 ± 0.02c 0.21 ± 0.02b 0.30 ± 0.01a 0.14 ± 0.04c
Nb max 246 ± 4a 239 ± 9a 250 ± 4a 247 ± 4a
δAmax (°) 110 ± 5b 115 ± 10b 146 ± 6a 116 ± 11b
LB int (cm) 36 ± 7b 42 ± 3a 46 ± 2a 43 ± 4a
WB int (cm) 3.2 ± 0.3b 3.4 ± 0.2ab 3.7 ± 0.1a 3.5 ± 0.3a
xm int 0.21 ± 0.03c 0.32 ± 0.03b 0.38 ± 0.02a 0.22 ± 0.02c
ym int 0.72 ± 0.04a 0.73 ± 0.03a 0.57 ± 0.02b 0.61 ± 0.08b
Model outputs
LAI 4.36 ± 0.19a 4.08 ± 0.18b 4.40 ± 0.09a 4.40 ± 0.15a
f PAR 0.976 ± 0.00a 0.966 ± 0.01b 0.961 ± 0.01b 0.974 ± 0.01a
MS 0.52 ± 0.01a 0.43 ± 0.03c 0.45 ± 0.01bc 0.49 ± 0.02ab
k 0.85 ± 0.02a 0.83 ± 0.03a 0.74 ± 0.03b 0.83 ± 0.04a
A d (mol CO2 d−1) 103 ± 0.2a 103 ± 0.4a 103 ± 0.0a 103 ± 0.2a
Composite traits
Petiole length (cm) 86 ± 16c 110 ± 13b 152 ± 4a 87 ± 23c
Leaf length (cm) 757 ± 24a 633 ± 27c 657 ± 8bc 695 ± 25b
Individual leaf area (m2) 8.30 ± 0.36a 7.24 ± 0.29c 7.33 ± 0.15bc 7.79 ± 0.20b
FreqLft (leaflets cm−1) 0.37 ± 0.01d 0.46 ± 0.03b 0.49 ± 0.01a 0.41 ± 0.02c
Individual leaflet area (cm2) 338 ± 15a 303 ± 14b 294 ± 11b 315 ± 7b
LW ratio (cm cm−1) 11.6 ± 3.5a 12.2 ± 1.0a 12.3 ± 0.2a 12.3 ± 1.8a

Superscript letters correspond to significant differences between ideotypes (Tukey’s test, P < 0.05).