Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 13;121(5):961–973. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx189

Table 3.

Comparison between simulated and measured kernel number per plant, final individual kernel weight, kernel growth rate of linear grain filling and duration of linear grain filling for the different treatments

Year Hybrid Plant density Kernel number per plant Final individual kernel weight Kernel growth rate of linear grain-filling Duration of linear grain-filling
Sim ± s.d. Mea ± s.d. RE (%) Sim ± s.d.(mg °C–1 d–1) Mea ± s.d. (mg °C–1 d–1) RE (%) Sim ± s.d. (mg °C–1 d–1) Mea ± s.d. (mg °C–1 d–1) RE (%) Sim ± s.d. (°Cd) Mea ± s.d. (°Cd) RE (%)
2008 ND108 2.8 688 ± 21 677 ± 26 2.6 0.355 ± 0.012 0.376 ± 0.016 5.8 0.51 ± 0.02 0.49 ± 0.03 5.1 691 ± 38 673 ± 25 3.5
2008 ND108 5.6 592 ± 35 606 ± 31 3.5 0.295 ± 0.013 0.298 ± 0.033 4.7 0.46 ± 0.02 0.47 ± 0.05 7.4 689 ± 79 657 ± 28 2.6
2009 ND108 5.6 586 ± 19 580 ± 23 6.9 0.318 ± 0.021 0.307 ± 0.004 2.1 0.43 ± 0.01 0.42 ± 0.02 5.8 647 ± 54 665 ± 60 4.1
2009 ZD958 2.8 736 ± 22 706 ± 29 2.3 0.374 ± 0.015 0.369 ± 0.048 3.6 0.46 ± 0.02 0.48 ± 0.03 4.3 774 ± 68 758 ± 17 5.2
2009 ZD958 5.6 603 ± 28 617 ± 33 2.1 0.307 ± 0.019 0.339 ± 0.026 4.5 0.42 ± 0.01 0.40 ± 0.03 2.1 762 ± 44 727 ± 13 2.7

Mea, measured; Sim, simulated; RE, relative error.