Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 23;121(5):833–848. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx141

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Calibration of the extended-FvCB module to CO2 response curve (A) and to light response curve (B), and verification of the performance of the extended-FvCB module under water stress with observed stomatal conductance as input (C). Points are observed values determined on individual leaves and lines are fitted values. The shaded areas around the dashed lines in C are the 95 % confidence interval of the fitted values. DAWW in C represents days after withholding water. Experimental data in A were derived from Quereix et al. (2001), while those in B and C were from the present study (see Materials and Methods for details).