Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 23;121(5):833–848. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx141

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Response of plant water flux at different soil water potentials to changes in τroot, transp (A, D), τgs, ABA (B, E) and τgsψleaf (C, F). Row 1 represents low evaporative conditions (2.4 mg per plant s−1), and row 2 represents high evaporative conditions (6 mg per plant s−1). The colour gradient from purple to red represents increasing absolute value of the tested parameters, 10–210 % of the default value (median value in the legend). One extra simulation (dark red points and lines), 10 times the default value was added for both τgs, ABA and τgsψleaf​​​.