Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 27;28(5):1857–1865. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy003

Table 2.

WM microstructure results.

WM Parameter Description Value ± SE F(1, 419) P
MD β 1 Slope (6.21 ± 1.77) × 10−6 12.29 5.03 × 10−4
β 2 Improvement phase 1 (−9.54 ± 4.05) × 10−6 5.54 0.02
β 4 Improvement phase 2 (−21.70 ± 8.79) × 10−6 6.10 0.01
AD β 1 Slope (6.63 ± 1.35) × 10−6 8.00 0.01
β 2 Improvement phase 1 (−1.07 ± 0.52) × 10−5 4.19 0.04
β 4 Improvement phase 2 (−2.34 ± 1.14) × 10−5 4.15 0.04
RD β 1 Slope (5.96 ± 1.56) × 10−6 14.63 1.51 × 10−4
β 2 Improvement phase 1 (−8.92 ± 3.61) × 10−6 6.09 0.01
β 4 Improvement phase 2 (−2.11 ± 0.78) × 10−5 7.43 0.01
FA β 1 Slope (−2.09 ± 0.79) × 10−3 6.97 0.01
β 2 Improvement phase 1 (3.40 ± 1.94) × 10−3 3.07 0.08
β 4 Improvement phase 2 (7.55 ± 3.75) × 10−3 4.06 0.05

Results of the nonlinear mixed effects model for each white matter metric in the full skeleton. The 2 improvement phases were estimated to begin during each training period. β2 represents the degree of improvement relative to the slope in improvement phase 1. β4 represents the degree of improvement relative to the slope in improvement phase 2. MD = mean diffusivity; AD = axial diffusivity; RD = radial diffusivity; FA = fractional anisotropy.