Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 8;9(7):1165–1172. doi: 10.7150/jca.23606

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analyses for the evaluation of variables that predict the presence of EOC

Univariate Multivariate
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Age (years) (<65 vs. ≥65) 4.39 (2.47, 8.18) <0.001 4.14 (2.00, 8.90) <0.001
WBC (per µL) (≤11000 vs. >11000) 2.86 (1.27, 7.06) 0.015
Hemoglobin (g/dL) (≤12.0 vs. >12.0) 0.42 (0.28, 0.64) <0.001
Platelets (×103 per µL) (≤400 vs. >400) 7.93 (3.52, 21.26) <0.001
CA125 (unit/mL) (≤35 vs. >35) 12.58 (8.26, 19.49) <0.001 9.87 (6.27, 15.84) <0.001
NLR (≤2.64 vs. >2.64) 4.50 (3.06, 6.68) <0.001 1.76 (1.00, 3.09) 0.049
PLR (≤191.71 vs. >191.71) 5.68 (3.70, 8.88) <0.001 2.41 (1.34, 4.38) 0.004
LMR (≤3.52 vs. >3.52) 0.21 (0.14, 0.33) <0.001 0.51 (0.28, 0.91) 0.024

Results of multiple logistic regression with variables show a P-value less than 0.05 in univariate regression.

EOC, epithelial ovarian cancer; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; WBC, white blood cell; CA125, cancer antigen 125; NLR, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-lymphocyte ratio; LMR, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio