Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 19.
Published in final edited form as: Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2014 Dec;11(4):376–392. doi: 10.1007/s11904-014-0233-9

Table 1.

IAPAC grading scale for quality of the body of evidence and strength of recommendations [19••]

Quality or strength Interpretation
Quality of the body of evidence
 Excellent 1. RCT evidence without important limitations
2. Overwhelming evidence from observational studies
 High 1. RCT evidence with important limitations
2. Strong evidence from observational studies
 Medium 1. RCT evidence with critical limitations
2. Observational study evidence without important limitations
 Low 1. Observational study evidence with important or critical limitations
Strength of recommendation
 Strong Almost all patients should receive the recommended course of action
 Moderate Most patients should receive the recommended course of action. However, other choices may be appropriate for some patients
 Optional There may be consideration for this recommendation on the basis of individual patient circumstances. Not recommended routinely

RCT randomized, controlled trial