Table 1.
Quality or strength | Interpretation |
---|---|
Quality of the body of evidence | |
Excellent | 1. RCT evidence without important limitations 2. Overwhelming evidence from observational studies |
High | 1. RCT evidence with important limitations 2. Strong evidence from observational studies |
Medium | 1. RCT evidence with critical limitations 2. Observational study evidence without important limitations |
Low | 1. Observational study evidence with important or critical limitations |
Strength of recommendation | |
Strong | Almost all patients should receive the recommended course of action |
Moderate | Most patients should receive the recommended course of action. However, other choices may be appropriate for some patients |
Optional | There may be consideration for this recommendation on the basis of individual patient circumstances. Not recommended routinely |
RCT randomized, controlled trial