Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 19;13(4):e0195693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195693

Table 2. Recognition memory testing for face identity with respect to valence effects.

Control MCI ANOVA F[1:76]
5 Min 30 Min 5 Min 30 Min Group Val GxV Time TxG VxT VxTxG
d’ Hap 0.94 (0.09) 0.62 (0.09) 0.66 (0.08) 0.35 (0.09) 10.5 22.8 0.1 12.5 0.0 4.6 0.0
d’ Ang 0.64 (0.08) 0.52 (0.08) 0.41 (0.07) 0.26 (0.08) .002 .0001 .71 .0001 .96 .04 .85
C Hap 0.44 (0.07) 0.29 (0.04) 0.51 (0.08) 0.56 (0.11) 4.1 9.3 0.0 0.0 2.4 2.3 0.0
C Ang 0.32 (0.06) 0.28 (0.04) 0.40 (0.06) 0.53 (0.12) .04 .003 .87 .98 .12 .13 .84
HR Hap 0.70 (0.02) 0.61 (0.02) 0.64 (0.04) 0.59 (0.04) 0.6 21.9 0.3 4.1 0.8 4.7 0.1
HR Ang 0.60 (0.02) 0.57 (0.03) 0.56 (0.04) 0.57 (0.04) .43 .0001 .61 .05 .38 .03 .79
SR Hap 72.6 (2.1) 70.9 (2.4) 70.0 (2.4) 71.6 (2.2) 0.1 3.6 0.7 4.5 2.3 2.9 3.9
SR Ang 69.1 (2.3) 71.6 (2.3) 68.6 (2.2) 70.9 (2.2) .73 .06 .42 .04 .13 .09 .06

Sensitivity of OLD/NEW facial identity discrimination (d’) per facial valence at acquisition, response bias (C), hit rate (HR), and confidence ratings (SR). Data of the left part of the Table represent mean (SEM) per Group, Valence (Val, V), and Time (T: 5 vs 30 Minutes). Data of the right part of the Table represent ANOVA statistics, F-values, and italic p-values, bold when statistically significant, per factor and interaction.