Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 7;22(5):2750–2759. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13569

Table 3.

Difference in d‐ROMs and biological antioxidant potential (BAP) test measurements between CG (PPI + Tap Water) and EG (PPI + ERW) group

Baseline Post‐treatment
CG n (%) EG n (%) χ2 P‐value CG n (%) EG n (%) χ2 P‐value
d‐ROMs test (U‐CARR)
<300 8 (20.0) 9 (20.5) .290 4 (10.0) 23 (53.5) <.001
300‐320 3 (7.5) 3 (6.8) 3 (7.5) 3 (7.0)
321‐340 2 (5.0) 5 (11.4) 5 (12.59 5 (11.6)
341‐400 12 (30.0) 6 (13.6) 13 (32.5) 9 (20.9)
401‐500 12 (3.0) 12 (27.3) 14 (35.5) 1 (2.3)
>500 3 (7.5) 9 (20.5) 1 (2.5) 2 (4.7)
BAP test (μEq/L)
≥2200 0 0 .393 0 10 (23.3) <.001
2200‐2001 0 0 0 4 (9.3)
2000‐1801 3 (7.5) 3 (6.8) 0 9 (20.9)
1800‐1601 0 0 1 (2.5) 8 (18.6)
1600‐1401 0 2 (4.5) 2 (5.0) 3 (7.0)
≤1400 37 (92.5) 39 (88.6) 37 (92.5) 9 (20.9)

CG, control group; EG, experimental group; d‐ROMs, derivatives reactive oxygen metabolites; ERW, electrolysed reduced water; PPI, proton pump inhibitors.

χ2 P‐value = Chi‐squared test. p value < 0,05 are considerated statistically significant.