Table 3. Physical behaviour classification of the second IPAQ compared against that of GENEA.

IPAQ	GENEA
	Couch Potato	Active Couch Potato	Ambulator	Active Ambulator	IPAQ Total
Couch Potato	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC
Active Couch Potato	9 (7 M, 2 F)	1 (0 M, 1 F)	NC	NC	10 (7 M, 3 F)
Ambulator	5 (2 M, 3 F)	NC	NC	NC	5 (2 M, 3 F)
Active Ambulator	47 (19 M, 28 F)	10 (7 M, 3 F)	11 (5 M, 6 F)	1 (1 M, 0 F)	69 (32 M, 37 F)
GENEA Total	61 (28 M, 33 F)	11 (7 M, 4 F)	11 (5 M, 6 F)	1 (1 M, 0 F)	84 (41 M, 43 F)

NC (not classified)–Based on their IPAQ data, participants were not classified into the group in question. M–males. F–females. p ≤ 0.05.