Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 30;9(24):16822–16831. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24706

Table 1. Characteristics of the patients at diagnosis.

Characteristics All (n = 25) PET2– (n = 19) PET2+ (n = 6)
Age, years, median (range) 68 (39–83) 68 (39–83) 69 (57–79)
Age < 60 8 (32%) 6 (32%) 2 (33%)
Male sex 9 (36%) 7 (37%) 2 (33%)
PS (ECOG)
0 5 (20%) 4 (21%) 1 (17%)
1 6 (24%) 3 (16%) 3 (50%)
≥2 14 (56%) 12 (63%) 2 (33%)
IESLG risk group*
Low 1 (4%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%)
Intermediate 12 (48%) 8 (42%) 4 (67%)
High 12 (48%) 10 (53%) 2 (33%)
MSK score
1 2 (8%) 2 (11%) 0 (0%)
2 10 (40%) 6 (32%) 4 (67%)
3 13 (52%) 11 (58%) 2 (33%)
Positive CSF cytology#,* 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%)
Ocular involvement§,* 1 (11,1%) 0 (0%) 1 (17%)
Germinal center type 7 (28%) 5 (26%) 2 (33%)
Non germinal center type 18 (72%) 14 (74%) 4 (67%)

PS: performance status; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IESLG: international extranodal lymphoma study group; MSK: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; GC: germinal center; non-CG: non germinal center DLBCL subtypes. *Data regarding CSF protein concentration were available in 14 patients. When missing, this data was considerate as elevated for the IESLG risk group assessment. #available for 12 patients at diagnosis; §available for 9 patients at diagnosis; *Absence of CSF and ocular involvement were excluded in all patients without initial evaluation during follow up.