Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 19.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2014 Apr 10;40(3):230–239. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2014.891038

Table 3.

Regression results for three mediation models.

Y Path b SE T
FTND a1 1.617 0.461 3.511**
a2 −0.026 0.072 −0.361
a3 0.020 0.007 2.785**
b1 −0.001 0.020 −0.027
b2 1.213 0.129 9.419**
c′ −0.372 0.195 −1.903
c −0.357 0.211 −1.695
BCSa b1 0.134 0.092 1.452
b2 6.012 0.598 10.054**
c′ 0.168 0.909 0.185
c 0.425 0.997 0.426
AISa b1 −0.043 0.093 −0.459
b2 5.794 0.601 9.642**
c′ −0.795 0.913 −0.870
c −0.825 0.988 −0.835
COb a1 1.668 0.471 3.540**
a2 −0.030 0.073 −0.407
a3 0.018 0.007 2.432*
b1 −0.067 0.113 −0.593
b2 2.373 0.736 3.222**
c′ −0.121 1.109 −0.110
c −0.232 1.103 −0.211
*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01.

a

Paths a1, a2, and a3 do not change across criterion outcomes 1–3 (n =461). To eliminate redundancy, these paths are only presented for Model 1.

b

Paths a1, a2, and a3 are presented for criterion outcome 4 separately because of the smaller sample size for these analyses (n =237). Note: FTND (Nicotine dependence; Y1), BCS (Barriers to Smoking Cessation total score; Y2), AIS (Affective inflexibility; Y3), and CO (Expired carbon monoxide; Y4).