Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2017 Oct 19;203:18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.10.018

Table 1.

Choice, preference and progressive ratio under food restriction, ad libidum food access and hormone treatment reversal.

Percent Cocaine Choice (mean ± SEM) Proportion Cocaine Preferring Cocaine PR (mean ± SEM) Food PR (mean ± SEM)
Food Restricted Ad Lib Food Hormone Reversal Food Restricted Ad Lib Food Hormone Reversal Food Restricted Ad Lib Food Food Restricted Ad Lib Food

Vehicle 32.3 ± 7.1 32.4% ± 6.1 43.2% ± 8.2 18.2% 13.6% *40.0% 12.6 ± 1.3 10.8 ± 1.7 12.6 ± 0.8 *10.7 ± 0.7
EB 63.7% ± 7.8 49.7% ± 9.1 44.8% ± 9.2 52.4% 42.9% 40.0% 15.3 ± 1.1 14.9 ± 1.1 13.2 ± 0.9 *14.8 ± 1.0
*

= p<0.05 for within subjects comparison.

PR means under food restriction were calculated from the subset of subjects tested for ad lib PR.