Table 3.
Association between human-extracted image phenotype and computer-extracted image phenotype
| Human-extracted assessment | Computer-extracted feature | p Value |
|---|---|---|
| Lesion size | Effective diameter | <10−12 |
| Surface area-to-volume ratio | <10−12 | |
| Maximum linear size | <10−12 | |
| Lesion volume | <10−12 | |
| Shape | Sphericity | 5.65 × 10−5 |
| Irregularity | 0.00398 | |
| Surface area-to-volume ratio | 0.363 | |
| Internal enhancement | Contrast | 0.378 |
| Correlation | 0.409 | |
| Difference in entropy | 0.353 | |
| Difference variance | 0.191 | |
| Energy | 0.186 | |
| Entropy | 0.194 | |
| Inverse difference moment | 0.466 | |
| IMC1 | 0.328 | |
| IMC2 | 0.340 | |
| Maximum correlation coefficient | 0.336 | |
| Sum average | 0.151 | |
| Sum entropy | 0.336 | |
| Sum variance | 0.702 | |
| Sum of squares | 0.297 | |
| Degree of margin spiculation | Mean margin sharpness | 0.292 |
| Variance margin sharpness | 0.227 | |
| Variance radial gradient histogram | 0.055 |
IMC Information measure of correlation