Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 1;20(4):557–566. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox162

Table 1.

Progression type and survival per treatment arm

Treatment Placebo
RT/TMZ
Bevacizumab
RT/TMZ
Placebo
RT/TMZ
Bevacizumab
RT/TMZ
Placebo
RT/TMZ
Bevacizumab
RT/TMZ
PFS OS PPS
Median, mo (95% CI) Median, mo (95% CI) Median, mo (95% CI)
Progression type
Classic T1 6.0 (5.3, 6.6) 7.9 (6.9, 9.2) 16.8 (15.1, 19.1) 14.2 (12.0, 15.1) 9.6 (7.8, 11.0) 5.7 (4.2; 6.9)
cT1 relapse 12.4 (10.0, 21.4) 11.8 (10.4, 12.9) 27.4(21.6, 40.7) 17.8 (15.9, 20.5) 13.9 (7.9, 14.9) 6.2 (5.0;7.5)
T2 diffuse 26.2 (19.4, _._*) 29.2 (18.9, 30.9) _._ *(23.9, _._*) _._* 5.6 (1.7, 18.6) 7.6 (4.4; _._*)
T2 circumscribed 10.4 (5.1, 18.2) 9.0 (7.9, 10.0) 18.9 (10.2, 27.2) 13.6 (12.1, 15.2) 5.9 (2.9, 9.1) 3.8 (2.7;5.0)
Primary nonresponder 2.3 (2.2, 2.3) 2.8 (2.1, 3.2) 9.9 (7.9, 13.0) 9.6 (3.5, 12.3) 6.8 (5.2, 10.9) 4.7 (0.6;8.0)

Note: Median time from start of treatment until PFS and OS differed between the individual PTs in univariate analysis. In contrast to PFS and OS, no difference in PPS was detected between the PTs. Due to the post hoc setting, no P-values are provided. *Median OS not reached due to data acquisition closure. PFS = progression-free survival, OS = overall survival, PPS = post-progression survival.