Table 5.

Experiment Results in Period 1 and Period 2 by un-primed and primed tasks

Dep Var: Whether clinician performed specific task (0/1)
		Period 1	Period 2
Improvement in performance due to treatment (compared to baseline)
Un-primed tasks
Trend for all treatments		0.003 (0.014	0.047*** (0.014)
+ marginal effects by treatment
	Control	omitted	omitted
	Gift	0.046*** (0.015)	0.017 (0.017)
	Delayed Gift	0.028* (0.015)	0.041** (0.017)
	Prize	0.029* (0.016)	0.027 (0.018)
Primed tasks
Trend for all treatments × primed		0.022** (0.008)	0.045*** (0.01)
+ marginal effects by treatment
	Control × primed	omitted	omitted
	Gift × primed	0.007 (0.011)	0.018 (0.014)
	Delayed Gift × primed	−0.015 (0.011)	−0.005 (0.014)
	Prize × primed	−0.007 (0.011)	0.002 (0.015)
Baseline effects		included
Clinician and patient effects		included
Consultation timing effects		included

Note: The data include 96,964 clinician-patient-task level observations. Results derived from Multi-level logit model with random effects at the patient and clinician level. Marginal Effects (percentage point increase compared to the omitted baseline) reported.

Impact for gift, delayed gift and prize are additional effects over the trend for all groups and impact for the control group is equal to the trend for all treatments Standard errors in parentheses: significance at 1% (***), 5% (**), 10% (*). Period 1 refers to data collected after the encouragement visit. Period 2 refers to data collected after the follow-up visit. Coefficients are from a single regression. Primed items are tasks that were specifically mentioned as important, during the encouragement visit.