Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 20.
Published in final edited form as: Front Ecol Evol. 2017 Oct 19;5:119. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00119

Table 2.

Multivariate multilevel model estimates for regions of interest implicated by rodent studies as modulating mate-guarding behavior.

ROI b Post. SD 95-% CrI δT Pr(b > 0) Pr(b < 0)
LS-L Intercept 0.96 0.03 0.87, 1.02
Jealousy −0.02 0.04 −0.08, 0.06 −0.18 31 % 69 %
LS-R Intercept 0.91 0.03 0.85, 0.97
Jealousy 0.04 0.03 −0.02, 0.10 0.55 93 % 7 %
AH-L Intercept 0.67 0.03 0.61, 0.74
Jealousy 0.01 0.04 −0.07, 0.10 0.14 63 % 37 %
AH-R Intercept 0.69 0.03 0.62, 0.76
Jealousy −0.04 0.04 −0.12, 0.05 −0.35 20 % 80 %
PCC-L Intercept 1.07 0.01 1.01, 1.09
Jealousy 0.04 0.02 0.01, 0.07 1.02 98 % 2 %
PCC-R Intercept 1.09 0.02 1.05, 1.14
Jealousy 0.01 0.03 −0.05, 0.06 0.05 55 % 45 %
MeA-L Intercept 0.70 0.03 0.64, 0.75
Jealousy −0.01 0.03 −0.07, 0.06 −0.04 44 % 56 %
MeA-R Intercept 0.70 0.03 0.64, 0.76
Jealousy −0.03 0.03 −0.10, 0.03 −0.40 16 % 84 %

Note. Intercept is the model estimate for the control condition. Jealousy is the difference from the control condition—the jealousy effect. Post. SD is the posterior standard deviation of the estimate. These estimates were all obtained from the same model. Note: interpretation of (δT) follows Cohen’s d (small = 0.2, medium = 0.5, large = 0.8).