Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2017 Dec 27;80(2):560–570. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27060

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Quantitative CEF assessment performed in N=14 left and right coronary artery segments from 10 healthy volunteers. The coronary CSA values measured in the proposed SG-GA method were similar to those from ECG-GA at rest (A) and during IHE (B), and both were in agreement with those obtained in the reference ECG-STD method at rest (A) and during IHE (B). Critically for CEF assessment, average percentage CSA change was similar in the SG-GA approach to those in ECG-GA and gold-standard ECG-STD method (C). Bars indicate standard error of the mean.