Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2017 Dec 17;80(2):529–537. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27045

Table 2.

Differences in image quality ratings between single-coil-array and dual-coil-array acquisitions from two blinded readers (No ratings of +2 or −2 were observed)

Cartilage
Sequence and Reader 2 Rating
Axial PD FSE Coronal PD FSE Sagittal DESS
−1 0 +1 −1 0 +1 −1 0 +1
Reader 1 Rating −1 1 5 0 1 2 0 0 0 0
0 0 4 0 0 6 1 0 10 0
+1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Meniscus

Sequence and Reader 2 Rating
Axial PD FSE Coronal PD FSE Sagittal DESS
−1 0 +1 −1 0 +1 −1 0 +1

Reader 1 Rating −1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
+1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tendons

Sequence and Reader 2 Rating
Axial PD FSE Coronal PD FSE Sagittal DESS
−1 0 +1 −1 0 +1 −1 0 +1

Reader 1 Rating −1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 8 0 1 8 1 0 10 0
+1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bone/Bone Marrow/Fat

Sequence and Reader 2 Rating
Axial PD FSE Coronal PD FSE Sagittal DESS
−1 0 +1 −1 0 +1 −1 0 +1

Reader 1 Rating −1 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
0 0 6 0 1 6 1 0 10 0
+1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

−1 - Dual Coil Images slightly worse than Single Coil Images

0 - No Difference between Images

+1 - Dual Coil Images slightly better than Single Coil Images