Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 21;26(5):272–279. doi: 10.1007/s12471-018-1103-7

Table 2.

Overview of relevant large scale registries forchronic heart failure care programmes in European countries

Registry of chronic HF patients Cohort size* Inclusion period Publication date Mean age Gender, female Ischaemic aetiology Comorbidity, HT vs DM % Medication
ACE/ARB; BB; MRA
ICD/CRT-D therapy, %
EuroHeartFailure survey [6] 11,304 2001–2003 2003 71 47 39 n/a vs 20% 62%; 37%; 21% n/a
ESC-HF Pilot study (n = 5118) [7]  3226 2009–2010 2010 67 30 50 58% vs 29% 88%; 87%; 44% ICD 13%, CRT-D 9%
ESC-HF-Long-term-Registry [8, 9]  7401 2011–2013 2013 66 29 43 58% vs 32% 89%; 89%; 59% n/a
The Swedish Heart Failure Registry (S-HFR), subset with EF < 30% [12]  5908 2003–2012 2016 72 23 61 34–48% vs 70% 88%; 85%; 53% 4–10%
Evidence-based Treatment in HF registry (Germany): EVITA-HF [13]  1853 2004–2011 2014 70 24 56 76% vs 39% 73%; 71%; 32% 18%
Spanish National Registry on Heart Failure: the RICA registry [14]  1368 2008–2013 2015 78 53 n.a. 86% vs 47% 87%; 64%; 32% n/a
Italian Network on Heart Failure Outcome registry IN-HF (n = 5610) [15]  3755 2007–2009 2013 69 24 46 43% vs 30% Not specified ICD 19%, CRT-D 7%
Adherence to guidelines in chronic HF: the MAHLER survey [16]  1410 2001–2002 2005 69 31 68 n/a 69%; 53%; 28% n/a
Data from the GWTG-HF (Get With The Guidelines) registry [17] 10,148 2005–2007 2009 68 36 15* n/a n/a 20%
The QUALIFY international registry [19]  6669 2013–2014 2017 63 26 n/a 64% vs 34% 87%; 87%; 69% ICD 12.1%, CRT-D 7.2%

*cohort size related to chronic heart failure with reported medication use

ACE enzyme inhibitor, ARB angiotensin II receptor blocker, BB beta-blocker, DM diabetes mellitus, HF heart failure, HT hypertension, ICD implantable cardioverter defibrillator, CRT-D cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator, MRA mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, n/a not available