Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 20;8:6343. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23977-0

Table 3.

Effects of nitrogen levels on weighted average of surface area and volume of superior and inferior grains of maize.

Year Hybrid N Treatment Surface area (μm2) Volume (μm3)
kg ha−1 Superior Inferior Superior Inferior
2010 Suyu20 0 6.45 ± 0.12g 6.34 ± 0.12i 17.5 ± 0.13lm 12.68 ± 0.49n
360 7.68 ± 0.13cde 7.02 ± 0.10cde 19.36 ± 0.10i 14.43 ± 0.29j
450 8.46 ± 0.11a 6.65 ± 0.06fghi 24.74 ± 0.17c 15.85 ± 0.37cd
540 6.08 ± 0.10h 6.41 ± 0.06hi 16.56 ± 0.13n 15.38 ± 0.12f
Suyu29 0 7.78 ± 0.12cde 7.64 ± 0.09a 20.42 ± 0.39g 15.68 ± 0.14e
360 7.45 ± 0.10e 6.57 ± 0.13ghi 17.36 ± 0.11m 14.39 ± 0.08j
450 8.57 ± 0.15a 7.15 ± 0.11bcd 25.15 ± 0.09b 15.91 ± 0.09c
540 7.55 ± 0.1de 7.27 ± 0.09bc 16.54 ± 0.12n 15.26 ± 0.07g
2012 Suyu30 0 6.99 ± 0.20f 6.44 ± 0.23ghi 14.96 ± 0.28o 12.75 ± 0.35n
360 7.48 ± 0.12e 7.28 ± 0.18bc 20.12 ± 0.24h 16.71 ± 0.27b
450 7.83 ± 0.29cd 6.74 ± 0.17efg 23.74 ± 0.37d 14.46 ± 0.35j
540 7.04 ± 0.26f 7.01 ± 0.22cde 18.37 ± 0.32k 17.54 ± 0.29a
Suyu20 0 6.50 ± 0.20g 6.63 ± 0.2fghi 16.5 ± 0.29n 13.15 ± 0.25m
360 7.71 ± 0.15cde 6.90 ± 0.23def 19.42 ± 0.26i 14.25 ± 0.36k
450 8.28 ± 0.14ab 6.66 ± 0.15fgh 22.35 ± 0.29e 13.99 ± 0.16l
540 7.07 ± 0.19f 6.75 ± 0.17efg 14.84 ± 0.3o 14.8 ± 0.42i
Suyu29 0 7.96 ± 0.13bc 6.9 ± 0.28def 19.14 ± 0.23j 15.17 ± 0.32gh
360 7.75 ± 0.15cde 7.08 ± 0.26cd 22.19 ± 0.27f 15.11 ± 0.24h
450 8.35 ± 0.17a 7.18 ± 0.27bcd 26.92 ± 0.41a 15.84 ± 0.41cd
540 7.48 ± 0.14e 7.42 ± 0.22ab 17.58 ± 0.38l 15.79 ± 0.28de
F-value R2 0.684** 0.753** 0.997** 0.979**
Year 1.24NS 1.15NS 8.14NS 12.91NS
Hybrid 13.52** 38.76** 502.52* 269.54*
N treatment 29.13** 30.61** 4721.69* 483.25*
Year × Hybrid 0.51NS 1.65NS 621.02** 47.74**
Year × N treatment 1.44NS 7.09** 27.79** 42.29**
Cultivar × N treatment 3.04* 3.84** 121.08** 122.38**
Year × Hybrid × N treatment 1.71NS 1.03NS 19.31** 21.74**

Means in the same column followed by the same letter do not differ statistically at the 0.05 probability level by an ANOVA protected Duncan’s test; *,**NS Significantly different at the 0.05 and 0. 01 probability levels and no significant difference, respectively.