Table 3.
Treatment regimen/ study | Type of study | Treatment duration (weeks) | HCV GT | Sample size | SVR rate (%) | SAE rate (%) | Treatment discontinuation rate (%) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sofosbuvir/ribavirin | ||||||||
PHOTON-1 Sulkowski et al. [84] |
CT | 12–24 | GT1–3 | 223 | GT1 24 W: 76% (87/114) GT2 12 W: 88% (23/26) GT2 24 W: 92% (22/24) GT3 12 W: 67% (28/42) GT3 24 W: 94% (16/17) |
6% (14/223) |
3% (7/223) |
|
PHOTON-2 Molina et al. [85] |
CT | 12–24 | GT1–4 | 274 | GT1 24 W: 85% (95/112) GT2 12 W: 89% (17/19) GT2 24 W: 83% (5/6) GT3 24 W: 89% (94/106) GT4 24 W: 84% (26/31) |
1% (4/274) |
2% (6/274) |
|
Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir | Co-administration of ledipasvir and TDF caused an increase in TDF serum concentration | |||||||
ERADICATE study Osinusi et al. [35] |
CT | 12 | GT1 | 50 | 98% (49/50) | 2% (1/50) |
0 | |
ION-4 Naggie et al. [36] |
CT | 12 | GT1/4 | 335 | 96% (322/335) | 2% (8/335) |
0 | |
PTV/RTV/OBV and DSV | Should be monitored for drug–drug interactions with RTV | |||||||
TURQUOISE-1 Sulkowski et al. [87] |
CT | 12–24 | GT1 | 63 | 12 W: 94% (29/31) 24 W: 91% (29/32) |
0 | 0 | |
Elbasvir/grazoprevir | ||||||||
C-EDGE CO-INFECTION Rockstroh et al. [88] |
CT | 12 | GT1/4/6 | 218 | 96% (210/218) | 1% (2/218) | 0 | |
Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir | Renal function should be monitored in TDF with velpatasvir co-administration | |||||||
ASTRAL-5 Wyles et al. [107] |
CT | 12 | GT1–4 | 106 | 95% (101/106) | 2% (2/106) | 2% (2/106) |
|
Sofosbuvir/daclatasvir | ||||||||
ALLY-2 Hinestrosa et al. [90] |
CT | 8-12 | GT1–4 | 203 | 12 W: 97.4% (149/153) 8 W: 76% (38/50) |
2% (4/203) | 0 |
CT clinical trials, RW real-world data, IFN interferon, DAAs direct-acting antivirals, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, HCV hepatitis C virus, 12 W at 12 weeks, 24 W at 24 weeks, GT genotype, SVR sustained viral response, SAE serious adverse event, TDF tenofovir disoproxil fumarate