Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 21;24(15):1658–1665. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i15.1658

Table 2.

Demographic and clinical aspects of the selected studies

Ref. n Age Male gender (%) waiting time (mo) MELD Underlying disease Major lesion diam (cm) Number lesions MC-OUT (%) AFP ≥ 200 ng/mL (%) LRT (%) Cut-off AUROC > cut-off (%) Recurr (%) 5-yr TFS
Xia et al[24] 343 49 ± 10 308 (90) NA 13 ± 6 HBV = 320 > 5:110 > 3:91 199 (58) 165 (48) 222 (65) 150 0.63 33 (10) NA < 150: 52
Other = 23 ≥ 150:25
Lai et al[25] 146 58 (54-63) 116 (80) 8 (3-10) 11 (8-11) HCV = 63 2.5 (1.7-3.5) 1 (1-2) 32 (22) 8 (6) 136 (93) 150 0.66 28 (19) 14 (10) < 150:92
HBV = 26 ≥ 150:81
Other = 57
Parisi et al[26] 150 54 ± 7 125 (83) 2 (0-12) NA HCV = 60 2.7 1 0 (-) 13 (9) 71 (47) 150 NA 17 (11) 19 (13) NA
HBV = 34
Other = 56
Nicolini et al[27] 70 57 (51-62) 62 (89) NA 11 (7-15) HCV = 41 1.3 (0.0-2.1) 1 (0-2) 12 (17) 6 (9)1 70 (100) 150 NA 5 (7) 8 (11) < 150:89
HBV = 15 ≥ 150:50
Other = 14
Harimoto et al[28] 190 ≥ 59:97 107 (56) NA ≥ 15:60 HCV = 134 > 5:8 > 3:41 66 (35) 30 (16)2 NA 70.4 0.70 97 (51) 28 (15) < 70.4:95
Other = 56 ≥ 70.4:76
1

AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL;

2

AFP ≥ 300 ng/mL. MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease; MC: Milan Criteria; AFP: Alpha-fetoprotein; LRT: Locoregional treatment; AUROC: Area under the receiver operator curve; TFS: Tumor-free survival; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; NA: Not available.