Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 20;19:274. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4637-6

Table 2.

True positive rate analysis for group size 10+10

Method Human gut I Human gut II Marine
B U B U B U
TMM 0.62 0.58 0.63 0.59 0.66 0.61
RLE 0.63 0.55 0.62 0.60 0.66 0.59
CSS 0.61 0.53 0.65 0.55 0.69 0.61
RCSS 0.61 0.56 0.62 0.59 0.65 0.50
Quantile-quantile 0.69 0.56 0.64 0.54 0.67 0.46
Upper quartile 0.61 0.49 0.63 0.56 0.66 0.42
Median 0.62 0.50 0.64 0.52 0.68 0.59
Total count 0.61 0.54 0.63 0.57 0.65 0.49
Rarefying 0.63 0.57 0.49 0.44 0.66 0.50

True positive rate at a fixed false positive rate of 0.01 for nine normalization methods and three metagenomic datasets using a group size of 10+10 for 10% DAGs with an average fold-change of 3.

B: balanced, 50% of effects added to each group.

U: unbalanced, 100% effects added to one group only