Table 4.
Change in selected hydroxylase inhibitors activity of Phaseolus vulgaris L. affected by the application of Kelpak SL.
| Bean cultivar | Application method | α-amylase inhibitors activity [kU g−1 d.m.] | Trypsin inhibitors activity [kU g−1 d.m.] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aura | C | 5.17 ± 0.81abc | 8.19 ± 1.18ab |
| SS 0.2% | 3.89 ± 1.09ab | 8.09 ± 1.04ab | |
| DS 0.2% | 5.32 ± 0.77bc | 8.51 ± 0.44b | |
| SS 0.4% | 5.13 ± 0.07b | 8.42 ± 0.44b | |
| DS 0.4% | 3.43 ± 0.96a | 7.98 ± 1.14ab | |
| Toska | C | 5.62 ± 0.37bc | 8.84 ± 0.22b |
| SS 0.2% | 6.10 ± 0.42c | 7.60 ± 0.22a | |
| DS 0.2% | 6.16 ± 0.33c | 7.53 ± 0.20a | |
| SS 0.4% | 6.09 ± 0.52c | 7.81 ± 0.61ab | |
| DS 0.4% | 5.90 ± 4.48c | 7.27 ± 0.55a | |
C, control; SS 0.2%, single spraying by 0.2% solution of Kelpak SL; DS 0.2%, double spraying by 0.2% solution of Kelpak SL; SS 0.4%, single spraying by 0.4% solution of Kelpak SL; DS 0.4%, double spraying by 0.4% solution of Kelpak SL.
Means (±SD, n = 18) in the columns followed by different small letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.