Skip to main content
. 2018 Spring;13(2):204–208. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i2.16564

Table 2.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (expressed as percentages) and 95% confidence intervals for each diagnostic method compared to the reference standard (root cross-sectioning)

Method Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
Direct visual 34.43 (22.73-47.69) 74.42 (63.87-83.22) 48.84 (33.31-64.54) 61.54 (51.49-70.91)
Loupe  40.98 (28.55-54.32) 76.74 (66.39-85.18) 55.56 (40.00-70.36) 64.71 (54.62-73.91)
Microscope  45.90 (33.06-59.15) 73.26 (62.62-82.23) 54.90 (40.34-68.87) 65.62 (55.23-75.02)
CBCT  88.52 (77.78-95.26) 88.37 (79.65-94.28) 84.37 (73.14-92.24) 91.57 (83.39-96.54)

PPV=positive predictive value; NPV=negative predictive method; CBCT=cone-beam computed tomography