Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 24;7(4):1070–1080. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1354

Table 1.

Stratified analysis of the association between pioglitazone use and risk of bladder cancer based on adjusted data from observational studies

Number of studies Odds ratio (95%CI) I 2 (%) P for heterogeneity
Overall 19 1.13 (1.03, 1.25) 31.3
Smoking adjusted
Yes 6 1.28 (1.02, 1.61) 43.1 0.07
No 13 1.03 (0.98, 1.08) 0
Region of study
Europe 8 1.17 (1.00, 1.36) 67.6 0.77
United States 9 1.03 (0.78, 1.36) 0
Asia 2 1.11 (0.92, 1.34) 0
Source of funding
Industry (Takeda) 5 1.00 (0.85, 1.19) 0 0.17
Other 14 1.20 (1.05, 1.36) 43.8
Type of comparators
Never use of Thiazolidinedione 3 1.62 (1.27, 2.08) 0 0.43
Never use of Pioglitazone 13 1.04 (0.99, 1.09) 0
Rosiglitazone 1 1.14 (0.79, 1.65)
Insulin 1 0.92 (0.63, 1.34)
Placebo 1 0.65 (0.33, 1.28)
Design of study
Cohort studies 12 1.12 (1.00, 1.24) 40.1 0.69
Case–control studies 7 1.21 (0.96, 1.56) 7.5
Sex
Men 3 1.12 (0.96, 1.31) 67.3 0.47
Women 3 1.01 (0.98, 1.08) 0
Cumulative dose‐1a
≤10.5 g 6 1.17 (0.99, 1.39) 0 0.04
10.5–28 g 4 1.27 (1.05, 1.54) 0
>28 g 4 1.66 (1.32, 2.07) 0
Cumulative dose‐2a
≤14 g 2 0.96 (0.79, 1.17) 0 0.80
14–40 g 2 1.07 (0.86, 1.32) 0
>40 g 2 0.92 (0.58, 1.44) 43.5
Cumulative duration‐1a
≤1 years 9 1.07 (0.92, 1.23) 33.9 0.01
1–2 years 7 1.25 (1.11, 1.40) 0.2
>2 years 7 1.49 (1.21, 1.84) 57.5
Cumulative duration‐2a
≤1.5 years 2 0.97 (0.78, 2.82) 0 0.53
1.5–4 years 2 0.94 (0.73, 1.22) 20.5
>4 years 2 1.11 (0.85, 1.44) 0
a

Some studies provide the results by cumulative dose (≤10.5 g vs. 10.5–28 g vs. >28 g;) or cumulative duration (≤1 year vs. 1–2 years vs. >2 years), while other studies provide the data based on cumulative dose (≤1.5 year vs. 1.5–4 years vs. >4 years) or cumulative duration (≤14 g vs. 14–40 g vs. >40 g).