Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 13;7(4):997–1005. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1308

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis of the association between clinical characteristics and survival in all patients and landmark group patients diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer

All patients Landmark patients
PFS OS PFS OS
HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
ECOG PS
0–1 1 1 1 1
2 1.178 0.854–1.624 0.317 1.474 1.067–2.036 0.019 1.167 0.813–1.674 0.402 1.470 1.022–2.113 0.038
Baseline platelet counts, × 109/L 1.002 1.000–1.003 0.021
Differentiation
Well‐moderate 1 1 1 1
Poor 1.418 1.091–1.842 0.009 1.700 1.307–2.213 <0.001 1.332 1.006–1.764 0.045 1.675 1.264–2.221 <0.001
Number of metastatic sites
≤2 1 1 1 1
>2 1.648 1.243–2.185 0.001 1.392 1.053–1.841 0.020 1.762 1.281–2.422 <0.001 1.478 1.081–2.022 0.014
Timing of CIN
Non‐early‐onset 1 1 1 1
Early‐onset 0.574 0.453–0.729 <0.001 0.607 0.478–0.770 <0.001 0.584 0.450–0.758 <0.001 0.619 0.477–0.803 <0.001

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; PFS, progression‐free survival; OS, overall survival.

Statistical significance was defined as a two‐sided P < 0.05.

Hazard ratios and 95% CIs for OS and PFS were estimated with Cox's proportional hazards models.

Adjusted for gender; age; ECOG PS; baseline hemoglobin concentration; baseline neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts; differentiation; liver and peritoneal metastases; number of metastatic sites; and timing of CIN.