Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 13;7(4):1490–1497. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1382

Table 2.

County‐level characteristics of Utah cancer patients diagnosed 2004–2008 in metropolitan and rural counties

Metropolitan counties (n = 32,498) Rural counties (n = 4906) P‐value for Chi‐square
n % n %
% Bachelors degree 2000
<15 106 0.3 1644 33.5 <0.0001
15–24 6977 21.5 2978 60.7
>24 25,414 78.2 284 5.8
Median family income 2000 ($)
<50,000 4052 12.5 3845 78.4 <0.0001
≥50,000 28,446 87.5 1061 21.6
% Families below poverty 2000
<7 4592 14.1 309 6.3 <0.0001
7–9 23,854 73.4 1147 23.4
>9 4052 12.5 3450 70.3
% Obese 2010
<23 716 2.2 1357 27.7 <0.0001
23–25 27,577 84.9 1418 28.9
>25 4205 12.9 2131 43.4
% Current smoker 2000‐2003
<15 10,657 32.8 1063 21.7 <0.0001
15–17 3488 10.7 1040 21.2
>17 18,353 56.5 2803 57.1
% Pap smear within 3 years
2000–2003 (age 18+; n = 17,350 women)
<75 1127 7.4 1649 76.1 <0.0001
≥75 14,056 92.6 518 23.9
%Mammography within 2 years 2000–2003 (age 40+; n = 17,350 women)
<65 7430 48.9 1746 80.6 <0.0001
≥65 7753 51.1 421 19.4

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (http://www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence – SEER 18 Regs Research Data + Hurricane Katrina Impacted Louisiana Cases, Nov 2015 Sub (1973–2013 varying) – Linked To County Attributes – Total U.S., 1969–2014 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2016, based on the November 2015 submission.