Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar;4(1):79–85. doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.03.06

Table 1. Summary of the detailed features of the 11 cases of large central LDH.

Case No. Sex Age (years) Chief complaint Gait disturbance Muscle weakness Disc level Spinal canal stenosis Approach side Skin incision** (cm) Foraminoplasty Operative time (min) Removed volume (g) Hospital stay (days)
1 M 22 Left leg pain (+) (−) L3/4 (−) L 7 (+) 33 1.6 3
2 F 31 Right leg pain (+) EHL 4/5 L4/5 (−) R 7 (−) 38 4.0 2
3 F 36 Left leg pain (−) EHL 4/5 L4/5 (−) L 7.5 (−) 41 1.9 3
4 M 32 Right leg pain (−) EHL 4/5 L4/5 (−) R 9 (−) 27 2.9 3
5 M 72 Bilateral leg pain (−) (−) L3/4 (+) R 7.5 (−) 55 1.1 2
6 F 29 Right leg numbness (−) EHL 1/5 L4/5 (−) R 9 (−) 58 2.4 2
7 M 66 Bilateral leg pain (+) TA 1/3 L3/4 (−) L 8 (−) 37 2.0 13
8 F 67 Right leg pain (+) (−) L4/5 (+) R 8 (+) 27 1.1 3
9 M 47 Right leg pain (−) Gastro 2/2 L4/5 (−) R 9 (−) 29 1.5 2
10 M 42 Left leg pain (+) (−) L3/4 (−) L 8 (−) 38 2.3 3
11 M 41 Left leg pain (−) (−) L4/5 (−) L 10 (−) 36 2.8 2

**, the distance from the midline to the skin incision; +, presence; −, absence. EHL, extensor hallucis longus; TA, tibialis anterior; Gastro, gastrocnemius; LDH, lumbar disc herniation; M, male; F, female; L, left; R, right.