Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Aug 2;179:198–204. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.07.004

Table 2.

Characteristics of the different RDS subpopulations according to sexual/injection risk profiles (n = 507).

N (%) Profile 1 & 3 High-risk sexual behaviour N = 37
N (%)
Profile 2 High-risk injection practices N = 22
N (%)
Profile 4 Safe injection and safe sex N = 86
N (%)
Profile 5 Safe injection and low sexual activity N = 362
N (%)
P valuea
Gender: male 27 (73) 20 (91) 62 (72) 354 (98) <0.01
Age: ≤35 years 26 (70) 14 (64) 53 (62) 173 (48) 0.01
Household registration in Haiphong: Yes 31 (84) 17 (77) 78 (91) 343 (95) 0.003
Median injection duration: ≤ 8 years 26 (70) 12 (55) 60 (70) 195 (54) 0.02
Non-injected drugs: methamphetamine 16 (43) 6 (27) 26 (30) 71 (20) 0.004
Hazardous drinking (Audit-Cb) 11 (30) 3 (14) 33 (38) 93 (26) 0.05
Binge drinking (Audit-Cc) 8 (22) 1 (5) 11 (13) 29 (8) 0.04
Helped someone for the first injection: Yes 8 (22) 8 (36) 8 (9) 53 (15) 0.01
Has already had sexual intercourse: Yes 37 (100) 10 (46) 86 (100) 110 (30) <0.01
One or several primary partners: Yes 25 (68) 10 (46) 56 (65) 110 (30) <0.01
At least one casual partner: Yes 15 (41) 1 (5) 13 (15) 0 (0) <0.01
Has already received money for sex: Yes 23 (62) 3 (14) 35 (41) 0 (0) <0.01
Has already paid for sex: Yes 6 (16) 4 (18) 21 (24) 0 (0) <0.01
Compulsory or voluntary stay in the past: Yes 14 (38) 6 (27) 38 (44) 192 (53) 0.03
Worries too much about things: Yes 15 (41) 11 (50) 36 (42) 107 (30) 0.03
Past suicide attempt: Yes 5 (13.5) 6 (27) 11 (13) 31 (9) 0.04
a

Fisher’s exact test or Chi square test.

b

Audit-c score ≥3 in women and ≥4 in men.

c

6 or more drinks on one occasion daily or almost daily, weekly or monthly.