Table A2:
The following information comes from Justin D. Levinson & Danielle Young, Different Shades of Bias: Skin Tone, Implicit Racial Bias, and Judgments of Ambiguous Evidence, 112 W. Va. L. Rev. 307, 348–49 (2010). |
1. The defendant purchased an untraceable handgun three weeks before the robbery. |
2. The store owner identified the defendant's voice in an audio line-up. |
3. A week after the robbery, the defendant purchased jewelry for his girlfriend. |
4. The defendant's brother is in jail for trafficking narcotics. |
5. The defendant recently lost his job. |
6. The defendant used to be addicted to drugs. |
7. The defendant has been served with a notice of eviction from his apartment. |
8. The defendant was videotaped shopping at the same Mini Mart two days before the robbery. |
9. The defendant frequently shops at a variety of Mini Mart stores. |
10. The defendant used to work at this particular Mini Mart. |
11. The defendant is left handed. |
12. The defendant was a youth Golden Gloves boxing champ in 2006. |
13. The defendant belongs to a local gun club called Safety Shot: The Responsible Firing Range. |
14. The defendant had a used movie ticket stub for a show that started 20 minutes before the crime occurred. |
15. The defendant wore a plaster cast on his broken right arm around the time of the robbery. |
16. The defendant is a member of an antiviolence organization. |
17. The defendant's fingerprints were not found at the scene of the crime. |
18. The defendant does not have a driver's license or car. |
19. The defendant has no prior convictions. |
20. The defendant graduated high school with good grades. |
*Per Levinson and Young's study, these questions were presented to participants in a randomized order.