Abstract
The clinical manifestations of Gaucher disease, a rare genetic lysosomal storage disorder, are debilitating, and the neuronopathic forms of the disease are fatal. The authors describe the current and investigational therapies for treatment.
INTRODUCTION
Gaucher disease (GD) is a rare lysosomal storage disease (LSD) affecting fewer than 20,000 people worldwide, some of whom may not be diagnosed.1,2 The disease was first described in 1882 by the French physician Philippe Gaucher.1,2 Patients with GD have a mutation in the GBA1 gene, located on chromosome 1 (1q21), that causes decreased activity of the enzyme acid beta-glucosidase (β-glucocerebrosidase [GCase] or glucosylceramidase E.C.3.2.1.45). Under normal conditions, GCase is responsible for cleaving lipid substrates, such as glucocerebroside (glucosylceramide [GLC]) into glucose and sphingosine.2 A lack of GCase interferes with the body’s ability to break down GLC. The monocyte–macrophage system is affected the most because of the high amount of GLC in the cell lysosome, causing accumulation of Gaucher cells.2 Under histological staining, Gaucher cells, which are approximately 20–100 mcM in diameter and have small eccentric nuclei and cytoplasm with crinkled striation, accumulate in many organs, particularly bone, bone marrow, the spleen, and the liver.1–6 Gaucher cells also cause the production of inflammatory cytokines that can cause enlargement of the spleen and liver, abnormalities of the lung, destruction of bone, and progression of anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia.3–9 There are more than 50 known LSDs, such as Fabry, Pompe, and Niemann–Pick disease, among others.5,10
GD affects each gender equally. There are three types of GD—type-1 (GD1), type-2 (GD2), and type-3 (GD3)—that are classified based on the presence of neurological deterioration, age at identification, and rate of disease progression.2,8 GD1, the most common form, comprises about 95% of cases and does not affect the central nervous system (non-neuronopathic).7 The incidence of GD1 is estimated to be one in 20,000 to one in 200,000 among people living in the U.S., Europe, and Israel.3,11 However, approximately one in 450 Ashkenazi Jews (i.e., those of Eastern, Central, and Northern European ancestry) have GD1, and one in 10 are carriers of the disease.8–11 The clinical manifestations of GD1 typically include splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, anemia, thrombocytopenia, osteopenia, and osteonecrosis.6 Patients with GD1 bruise and bleed easily; they typically present with chronic fatigue and with bone infarctions or bone fractures due to osteopenia.11
GD2 and GD3 are neuronopathic forms that affect about 5% of GD patients.8,9 GD2, also known as acute neuronopathic GD, occurs in newborns and infants.9,11 The disorder is marked by severe neurological symptoms in the brain that may result from accumulation of GLC.1,9 Affected newborns and infants first show oculomotor abnormalities, such as involuntary horizontal eye movement, followed by brainstem involvement, which can lead to hypotonia, spasticity, strabismus, seizures, and other muscle-related issues.5 Affected infants may also develop life-threatening complications, such as respiratory distress and pneumonia.8 Children with GD2 usually die within the first two years of life.5
Like GD2, GD3 is neuronopathic, but it is chronic. GD3 is further divided into subgroups 3a, 3b, and 3c. GD3a typically has only mild visceral manifestations but causes severe progressive myoclonic seizures, which can lead to death within the first two decades. GD3b involves more visceral features, such as massive enlargement of the liver and spleen, growth and mental retardation, and supranuclear gaze palsy. Patients with GD3c exhibit rare cardiac mitral and aortic calcification and often die in early adulthood. In Asia, GD2 and GD3 comprise about 60% of all GD cases.2,12–15
Current treatment of GD includes enzyme replacement therapies (ERTs) and substrate reduction therapies (SRTs). Potential treatments under investigation include a newer SRTs, pharmacological chaperone therapies (PCTs), and histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs).
EXPERT CONSENSUS ON MANAGEMENT GOALS FOR GD1
Recently, all 35 members of the European Working Group on Gaucher Disease (EWGGD) were invited to participate in a consensus study using online surveys. Twenty-five EWGGD members who are physicians participated; other members supported the initiative but felt they lacked the necessary clinical experience.16 These physicians from 16 countries on average treated 92 GD1 patients (range, two to 600).16 Three rounds of surveys were executed starting with 65 statements to reach consensus for GD1 management goals. At the end of three rounds after modifying the statements, the experts agreed on 42. The short-term, long-term, and general consensus management goals are presented in Tables 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In general, the consensus panel agreed that physicians should aim to restore normal values, prevent complications, and eliminate or reduce signs and symptoms of anemia, bleeding tendency, bone disease, and liver, spleen, and pulmonary complications.16 The importance of improving quality of life, reducing fatigue, and maintaining normal participation in school or work activities was also included in the consensus. In addition, detection of early malignancies, possible parkinsonism, and prediabetes was cited, as GD patients are likely to benefit from prompt initiation of appropriate care and treatment.16
Table 1.
Short-Term Management Goals for Gaucher Disease Type-1*
| Category | Management Goals |
|---|---|
| Anemia-related symptoms |
|
| Bleeding tendency |
|
| Mobility |
|
| Visceral complications |
|
| General well-being |
|
Table 2.
Long-Term Management Goals for Gaucher Disease Type-1*
| Category | Management Goals |
|---|---|
| Anemia-related symptoms |
|
| Bleeding tendency |
|
| Mobility |
|
| Visceral complications |
|
| Pulmonary complications |
|
| General well-being |
|
| Pregnancy and delivery |
|
Table 3.
General Management Goals for Gaucher Disease Type-1*
| Category | Management Goals |
|---|---|
| Long-term complications |
|
| General |
|
ENZYME REPLACEMENT THERAPY
For more than a century after the discovery of GD, patients were treated entirely with supportive measures, such as iron or blood transfusions to treat bleeding due to low hemoglobin levels or with splenoctomy.17 In 1991, the first intravenous (IV) ERT—alglucerase (Ceredase, Genzyme)—was introduced to reduce the accumulation of GLC by supplementing defective GCase enzymes with active ones.18 This approach has been effective in reducing the systemic manifestations of GD, such as splenomegaly.19
Alglucerase was manufactured using human placental tissue collected as a byproduct of human serum albumin manufacture. Although the treatment was effective, the number of placenta needed to make enough drug for one patient treatment per year was estimated at 50,000 (10–12 metric tons).20,21 Genzyme then introduced imiglucerase (Cerezyme), which is produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells as a recombinant analogue of GCase. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved imiglucerase in 1994, and alglucerase was discontinued in 1998 after nearly all patients had been switched.21 Imiglucerase is administered by IV infusion over one to two hours. The dosage is individualized for each patient and ranges from 30 to 60 units/kg every two weeks.2,22
In June 2009, Genzyme announced a viral contamination at its manufacturing site, which caused a dramatic reduction in the global supply of imiglucerase.23 In 2010, the FDA approved velaglucerase alfa (Vpriv, Shire Human Genetic Therapies), an analogue of recombinant GCase that is produced in human fibrosarcoma cell lines.24 Two years later, the FDA approved taliglucerase alfa (Elelyso, Pfizer), which is manufactured using genetically modified carrot plant root cells.2,25–27
There are some differences in the amino acid structure and glycosylation of these three ERTs. The amino acid composition of imiglucerase and taliglucerase alfa differs from human GCase, while velaglucerase has the same amino acids found in humans. Taliglucerase alfa differs from velaglucerase alfa and imiglucerase in its glycosylation due to α-(1,2)-xylose and α-(1,3)-fucose, which are unique to plant-derived proteins. Imiglucerase has a mannose structure, while velaglucerase alfa contains longer-chain high mannose-type glycans. Based on x-ray crystallography of the structures and in vitro study of various expressions of mannose receptor binding, all three ERTs are similar in macrophage uptake of the drugs, with velaglucerase having greater cellular uptake than imiglucerase.3,28–30
Imiglucerase, velaglucerase, and taliglucerase are indicated for the treatment of pediatric and adult patients with GD1.22–30 Within four years of initiating imiglucerase therapy, 93% of patients in studies showed significant improvement. Taliglucerase has resulted in significant improvements in liver volume, platelet counts, and hemoglobin.27–30 In clinical trials, 2% of the patients treated with taliglucerase experienced urticaria, hypotension, flushing, wheezing, chest tightness, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness.26 Table 4 lists adverse effects and other characteristics of the ERTs.
Table 4.
| Imiglucerase (Cerezyme, Genzyme Corp.) | Velaglucerase Alfa (Vpriv, Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Inc.) | Taliglucerase Alfa (Elelyso, Pfizer, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient type | Standard care for GD1, non-neuronopathic GD3 | Pediatric (age 4–17 years) and adult GD1, severe GD | Adults and children with GD1 |
| Switching between medications | Patients treated with imiglucerase can switch to velaglucerase alfa or taliglucerase alfa with same dose. | Patients on imiglucerase or taliglucerase alfa can be switched to velaglucerase alfa at same dose. | Patients on imiglucerase can be switched to velaglucerase and taliglucerase alfa at the same dose. |
| Dosing | Recommended dose: 60 units/kg IV every 2 weeks. Clinical trials ranged from 2.5 units/kg three times a week to 60 units/kg every 2 weeks. | Recommended dose: 60 units/kg IV every 2 weeks. Clinical trials ranged from 15 units/kg to 60 units/kg every 2 weeks. | Recommended dose: 60 units/kg IV every 2 weeks. Clinical trials ranged from 11 units/kg to 73 units/kg once every 2 weeks. |
| Pharmacokinetics | Plasma half-life, 3–11 minutes; plasma clearance, 0.6–1.22 L/h/kg; volume of distribution, 0.09–0.15 L/kg | Plasma half-life, 11–12 minutes; plasma clearance, 6.72–7.56 mL/min/kg; volume of distribution, 82–108 mL/kg | Plasma half-life, 18.9–28.7 minutes; plasma clearance, 20–30 L/h/kg; volume of distribution, 7.3–11.7 L/kg |
| Adverse reactions | Nausea, abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, rash, fatigue, headache, fever, dizziness, chills, backache, tachycardia, and infusion-related reactions. | Adverse reactions more commonly seen in pediatrics: upper respiratory tract infection, rash, prolonged aPTT, pyrexia. Other adverse reactions: nausea, abdominal pain, back pain, joint pain, diarrhea, rash, fatigue, headache, dizziness, pyrexia, asthenia, fatigue, and infusion-related reactions. | Upper respiratory tract infection/ nasopharyngitis, pharyngitis/ throat infection, headache, arthralgia, influenza, urinary tract infection, pyelonephritis, back pain, extremity pain, infusion-related reactions. |
aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time; GD = Gaucher disease; GD1 = GD type-1; GD3 = GD type-3; IV = intravenous.
Approximately 15% of patients treated with imiglucerase develop immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies during the first year of treatment.24 These antibodies usually develop in the first six months of therapy, but in rare cases they appear after 12 months. Velaglucerase and taliglucerase also have the potential for development of immunogenicity. In clinical studies, one of the 54 ERT-naïve patients treated with velaglucerase developed IgG antibodies to the drug, but did not experience hypersensitivity reactions. Patients who are switched to velaglucerase should be monitored for the development of antibodies to velaglucerase.30 In general, many patients treated with ERTs eventually develop tolerance to the antibodies. Prior to infusions, pretreatment with antihistamines or sometimes steroids can decrease the reaction.22–30
The average wholesale prices (AWPs) of these ERTs are $1,903 per vial for imiglucerase (400 units), $1,652 per vial for velaglucerase (400 units), and $935 per vial for taliglucerase (200 units). Patients are often administered 60 units/kg every two weeks. As this dosage, the approximate annual costs for imiglucerase, velaglucerase, and taliglucerase would be $544,260, $472,475, and $510,510, respectively, for a 70-kg adult, or $148,435, $128,860, and $145,860 for an 18-kg child.31 However, discounts may lower these costs for individual patients depending on their health insurance plans. The cost of the nurses or doctors who administer the drug and other hospital expenses, as well as the potential costs of managing GD complications, have not been factored into these costs.
SUBSTRATE REDUCTION THERAPY
Although ERTs are beneficial for the treatment of GD, there is still a need to find drugs that are less costly, easier to administer, less immunogenic, and capable of treating GD2 or GD3 subtypes. SRT was first proposed in 1972 as a possible approach for the treatment of GD.32 The principle mechanism of action of SRT is to inhibit the enzyme UDP-glucose ceramide glucosyltransferase, the first enzyme in the pathway for glycosylating sphingolipids. This enzyme is responsible for synthesis of GLC and other glycosphingolipids. By inhibiting the enzyme, the accumulation of GLC within the monocyte–macrophage system into the lysosome is reduced. The FDA has approved two oral SRTs for the treatment of GD: miglustat (Zavesca, Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc.) in 200333 and eliglustat tartrate (Cerdelga, Genzyme) in 2014.34
Miglustat is an N-alkylated iminosugar, a synthetic analogue of D-glucose.35 Miglustat was developed to treat the neuronopathic forms of GD, GD2, and GD3. The drug can penetrate the blood–brain barrier. However, in clinical trials, miglustat did not improve the neuronological condition of GD3 patients.2,11,36 Miglustat also inhibits intestinal disaccharides, causing a high incidence of diarrhea (85%). Other adverse effects are weight loss, numbness, and the feeling of burning on the hands and feet.2,37 Diarrhea can be controlled with loperamide and by limiting the consumption of sugar and milk.37 Miglustat is now used as a second-line treatment in the U.S., Europe, and Israel for patients who are unable to take IV ERTs or are intolerant of them.2 The dosage is one 100-mg capsule taken three times daily (reduced to twice daily if patients experience tremor or diarrhea). Other important information regarding miglustat and eliglustat appears in Table 5.
Table 5.
| Miglustat (Zavesca, Actelion Pharmaceuticals) | Eliglustat (Cerdelga, Genzyme Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| Patient type | Patients with mild GD who are unable to receive ERT; use as second treatment option. | Patients with GD1. |
| Dosing | 100-mg capsule three times a day. For patients with severe diarrhea and/or tremor, reduce dose to one or two capsules per day. For patients with CrCl of 30–50 mL/min, one capsule per day. Not recommended if CrCl < 30 mL/min. | 100-mg capsule (equivalent of 84 mg) twice a day for IMs and EMs of CYP2D6 genotypes or once daily for PMs. Administer FDA-approved genotype testing before use. |
| Pharmacokinetics | Half-life, 6–7 hours; bioavailability, 97%; excretion, renal unchanged. | Half-life, 6.5 hours (EMs) to 8.9 hours (PMs); low oral bioavailability due to significant first-pass metabolism; excretion: fecal, 51.4%; urine, 41.8%. |
| Adverse reactions | Peripheral neuropathy, weight loss, diarrhea, tremor, flatulence, abdominal pain, dyspepsia, headache, paresthesia, influenza-like symptoms, cramps, visual disturbances, thrombocytopenia. | Incidence of 10% or greater: arthralgia, headache, nausea, fatigue, back pain, pain in extremities. Occasional: upper abdominal pain, diarrhea, migraine, flatulence, oropharyngeal pain, dizziness, asthenia, reflux disease, constipation, palpitation, rash. |
CrCl = creatinine clearance; CYP = cytochrome P450; EMs = extensive metabolizers; ERT = enzyme replacement therapy; GD = Gaucher disease; GD1 = GD type-1;
IMs = intermediate metabolizers; PMs = poor metabolizers.
Eliglustat was approved after phase 2 and 3 trials involving more than 400 GD1 patients in 29 countries. The phase 3 trials—ENCORE, ENGAGE, and EDGE—involved 146, 40, and 171 GD1 patients, respectively.2,38–46 The structure of eliglustat differs from miglustat in that it is a D-threo-1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino-3-morpholino-propanol, a ceramide analogue.43,44 During the clinical trials in GD1 patients, mean spleen and liver volumes decreased by 63% and 28%, respectively, and mean hemoglobin level and mean platelet count increased by 2.3 g/dL and 95%, respectively.39–46 Improvements in bone marrow score and bone mineral density and reduction of glucosylsphingosine were also observed.46 The adverse effects of eliglustat include arthralgia, headache, nausea, fatigue, back pain, and pain in the extremities. Other occasional adverse effects include upper abdominal pain, diarrhea, migraine, flatulence, oropharyngeal pain, dizziness, asthenia, reflux disease, constipation, palpitation, and rash.2,39–46
Although eliglustat’s pregnancy category is C and miglustat’s is X, based on expert opinion, pregnant or breastfeeding women or male patients who are trying to have children should discuss this with the physicians who treat their GD.
Eliglustat is dosed according to patient cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 genotype, which is determined by an FDA-approved test. The recommended dosing of eliglustat is 84 mg twice a day for CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs) and intermediate metabolizers (IMs) or 84 mg once daily for CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PMs). A specific dose cannot be recommended for patients whose CYP2D6 genotype is unknown (indeterminate metabolizers).38–41,45–46
Eliglustat is contraindicated in ultrarapid metabolizers, EMs, or IMs taking a strong or moderate CYP2D6 inhibitor concomitantly with a strong or moderate CYP3A inhibitor, or in IMs or PMs taking a strong CYP3A inhibitor.2 Eliglustat may cause prolongation of the PR, QT, and/or QRS intervals; its use is not recommended in patients with pre-existing cardiac disease or long QT syndrome or in those taking class IA or class III antiarrhythmics.2 The use of eliglustat is also contraindicated in patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment or hepatic impairment.2 Miglustat and eliglustat are provided in monthly dose packs with an AWP of $32,184 (90 capsules) and $29,131 (56 capsules), respectively. At recommended dosages (which may vary based on genotype or other patient-specific issues), the approximate annual AWPs of miglustat and eliglustat are $386,210 and $349,575, respectively.31 These prices do not reflect discounts that may apply under various health insurance plans
GD3 TREATMENT
None of the currently available therapies is effective in treating the neuronopathic forms of GD. In GD2, disease progression involving the central nervous system is usually overwhelming; fatality occurs in infancy with little to no impact of ERTs seen in these patients.2 In GD3, where phenotypic variability and progression of neuronological manifestations is slower, ERTs have the potential for favorable outcomes by alleviating the visceral and hematologic aspects of the disease, therefore improving the quality of life.47
Due to the rarity of GD3, reports of ERTs’ efficacy in treating hematologic and visceral problems had been limited to a small single-center, off-label study.48–51 However, the International Collaborative Gaucher Group (ICGG) Gaucher Registry has now collected the largest set of data on the use of imiglucerase in GD3 patients during their childhood or adolescent years. As of September 2015, there were 289 GD3 patients in the ICGG Registry who had their first imiglucerase treatment before the age of 18 years.47,52 A total of 253 GD3 patients were treated with imiglucerase for up to five years. The majority have GBA mutations of L444p (77%) and D409H (7%).47 At baseline, these GD3 patients exhibited early onset of severe hematologic and visceral disease and growth failure. During the first year of imiglucerase treatment, hemoglobin levels and platelet counts increased (decreased anemia), liver and spleen volumes decreased (decreased thrombocytopenia and hepatosplenomegaly), and linear growth accelerated. The life span of untreated GD3 patients was a median of 12 years.53 The probability of surviving for at least five years after starting imiglucerase was 92%. Of the GD3 deaths reported in the registry after imiglucerase treatment, some were due to progression of neurological, cardiac, or pulmonary complications. The GD3 patients who died of cardiac causes were mostly D409H homozygous, with manifestation of cardiac valvular, coronary, or aortic calcifications.54
Several combination therapies using ERT and SRT for the treatment of GD3 have also shown success. Patients exhibited marked improvement of neurological signs, such as reductions in seizure frequency and improved ability to move around without a wheelchair.55–59 Early combination treatment using SRT and ERT might prevent or delay neurological onset, but among patients who already have neurological impairment, it might be more difficult to treat and take more time to see marked improvement.55–59 Currently, four clinical trials are recruiting GD3 patients.60 An open-label, multicenter, multinational clinical trial recruiting GD3 patients is ongoing with completion expected by 2022. This phase 2 trial is studying the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of venglustat (GZ/SAR 402671).60
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANT
In an early study of GD, investigators used allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) to treat an 8-year-old boy with GD3, but the result was disappointing. Infiltration of the bone marrow by Gaucher cells remained unchanged, and the patient died from sepsis.61 In another case report, a 2-year-old girl with neuronopathic GD underwent BMT. During the subsequent 24 months, there was no improvement of her neuronopathic manifestations, hepatic size, enzyme levels, or histology. This patient also died of sepsis at 24 months post-BMT.62
Because BMT appears to have little or no effect on the neuronopathic aspects of GD and because of its inherent risks (including high morbidity and high mortality), this procedure is not generally recommended for GD patients who have advanced neurological symptoms.63 Since the introduction of ERTs and SRTs, BMTs are rarely performed in GD patients in the U.S.
INVESTIGATIONAL TREATMENTS
Lucerastat is the newest SRT under investigation. Lucerastat, or N-butyldeoxygalactonojirimycin ([2R, 3S, 4R, 5S]-1-butyl-2-[hydroxylmethyl] piperidine-3, 4, 5-triol), is a soluble, low-molecular-weight oral iminosugar. It was able to cross the blood–brain barrier in a mouse model of GM2 gangliosidosis, reducing accumulation of GM2 in the brain and improving neuro motor performance and survival in the mouse model.64 Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of lucerastat were investigated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. A single ascending-dose study recruited 39 patients and a multiple ascending-dose study recruited 37 patients.65–67 The participants received oral doses of 100 mg, 300 mg, 500 mg, or 1,000 mg of lucerastat. Some of the adverse effects noted were constipation, dyspepsia, headache, rash, and increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels. No severe or serious adverse effects or clinically relevant abnormalities of vital signs and 12-lead electrocardiograms were observed.65–67
In addition to conducting further evaluations of the available ERTs and SRTs, researchers continue to look for new therapeutic alternatives for GD1, GD2, or GD3. Potential future treatments include pharmacological chaperone therapy (PCT).68–70 PCT, also known as enzyme enhancement therapy, uses chemicals to stabilize or reactivate misfolded GCase within cells. One of these agents is ambroxol, an over-the-counter expectorant used in many parts of the world to treat various airway infections, such as pneumonia or cystic fibrosis.68–70 In laboratory studies, ambroxol was found to increase the enzymatic activity of various misfolded mutant forms of GCase in the endoplasmic reticulum, making the enzyme fold properly and amending its function.68–70 Because ambroxol can cross the blood–brain barrier, it provides a promising option for GD3. High-dose ambroxol given at 25 mg/kg per day to a maximum daily dose of 1,300 mg in a study of five patients produced remarkable improvement in neuronological symptoms, including reduction of myoclonus seizures and pupillary light reflex dysfunction.71 Ambroxol may also be useful for GD1 with neurological complications such as parkinsonism or peripheral neuropathy.71 Another PCT, isofagomine tartrate, developed by Amicus Therapeutics, was designed to bind and stabilize misfolded GCase from mutation of the N370S gene.72 However, initial clinical trials failed to show improvements, and further development of the drug was halted in 2009.73
HDACIs, such as valproic acid, are another class of medications being investigated to treat GD.74,75 HDACIs have been used to treat inflammatory diseases, psychiatric/neurological disorders, and cancer.76–78 They also have been tried in in vitro studies of inherited diseases that arise from protein misfolding, such as cystic fibrosis, Huntington’s, and type C Niemann–Pick disease.74,75 Approximately 360 missense mutations have been identified in GD. This mutation causes GCase to fold improperly.74,75 In vitro study using fibroblasts from GD patients showed that an HDACI (LB-205) modulated molecular chaperones, such as heat shock protein (Hsp) 90 and Hsp 70, restoring the activity of GCase.74,75
While preclinical findings involving PCT or HDACIs have been promising, it remains unknown clinically if these compounds can effectively reduce GLC accumulation in GD patients.
CONCLUSION
Intravenous ERTs are the standard care for most patients with GD, but these drugs have no effect on GD2 or GD3 patients because of their inability to cross the blood–brain barrier. At 60 units/kg every two weeks, the annual AWP of therapy using available ERTs imiglucerase, taliglucerase, and velaglucerase ranges from $128,860 to $148,435 for an 18-kg child or $472,475 to $544,260 for a 70-kg adult.31 Currently, there is no evidence for a clinician to recommend any one ERT over the others.
Orally administered SRT offers an alternative treatment for GD. Two SRTs approved by the FDA are miglustat and eliglustat. Miglustat is indicated for the treatment of mild-to-moderate GD1 patients for whom ERT is not a therapeutic option. Miglustat warnings and precautions include peripheral neuropathy, tremors, and diarrhea. Eliglustat is indicated for treatment-naïve GD1 and for patients who are stable on ERTs but seek the convenience of oral dosing. FDA-approved testing to determine the genotype of patients should be conducted prior to prescribing eliglustat. GD1 patients who are CYP2D6 EMs, IMs, or PMs should take eliglustat only after adjustment of the dose. Patients who are CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers may not achieve adequate concentrations of eliglustat. Clinicians should monitor drug interactions, pregnancy status, patient compliance, and cardiac, renal, and liver status. Depending on the dose, the average yearly cost ranges from $349,575 to $386,210.31
Tables 4 and 5 list therapeutic options for GD and summarize important information for practicing clinicians, including dosing, pharmacokinetics, pregnancy category, and adverse effects, and describe the administration of all three available ERTs.79,80
Investigational approaches for GD treatment include ambroxol and HDACIs. Further clinical studies are needed to learn more about the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of these agents.
Footnotes
Disclosures: The authors report no commercial or financial interests in regard to this article.
REFERENCES
- 1.Grabowski G. Gaucher disease: enzymology, genetics, and treatment. In: Harris H, Hirshchorn K, editors. Advances in Human Genetics. Vol. 21. New York, New York: Plenum Press; 1993. pp. 377–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stirnemann J, Belmatoug N, Camou F, et al. A review of Gaucher disease pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatments. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(2):E441. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goker-Alpan O. Therapeutic approaches to bone pathology in Gaucher disease: past, present, and future. Mol Genet Metab. 2011;104:438–447. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Conradi NG, Kalimo H, Sourander P. Reactions of vessel walls and brain parenchyma to the accumulation of Gaucher cells in the Norrbottnian type (type III) of Gaucher disease. Acta Neuropathol. 1988;75:385–390. doi: 10.1007/BF00687792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Grabowski GA. Gaucher disease and other storage disorders. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012;2012:13–18. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2012.1.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Genes and Disease. Bethesda, Maryland: National Center for Biotechnology Information; 1998. [Accessed September 12, 2014]. Gaucher disease. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22242. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pastores GM, Hughes DA. Gaucher disease. [Accessed June 8, 2012]. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1269/?report.
- 8.Beutler E, Grabowski GA. Gaucher disease. In: Scriver C, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, editors. The Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Diseases. 8th ed. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. pp. 3635–3668. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hruska KS, LaMarca ME, Scott CR, et al. Gaucher disease: mutation and polymorphism spectrum in the glucocerebrosidase gene (GBA) Hum Mutat. 2008;29:567–583. doi: 10.1002/humu.20676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Butters TD, Mellor HR, Nariya K, et al. Small-molecule therapeutics for the treatment of glycolipid lysosomal storage disorders. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003;358:927–945. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zimran A, Gelbart T, Westwood B, et al. High frequency of the Gaucher disease mutation at nucleotide 1226 among Ashkenazi Jews. Am J Hum Genet. 1991;49:855–889. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zimran A, Elstein D. Lipid storage diseases. In: Lichtman MA, Kipps T, Seligsohn U, et al., editors. Williams Hematology. 8th ed. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010. pp. 1065–1071. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Benito JM, Fernandez JMG, Mellet CO. Pharmacological chaperone therapy for Gaucher disease: a patent review. Expert Op Ther Patents. 2011;21:885–903. doi: 10.1517/13543776.2011.569162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bohlega S, Kambouris M, Shahid M, et al. Gaucher disease with oculomotor apraxia and cardiovascular calcification (Gaucher type IIIc) Neurology. 2000;54:261–263. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.1.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jeong SY, Park SJ, Kim HJ. Clinical and genetic characteristics of Korean patients with Gaucher disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2011;46:11–14. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2010.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Biegstraaten M, Cox TM, Belmatoug N, et al. Management goals for type 1 gaucher disease: an expert consensus document from the European Working Group on Gaucher Disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2018;68:203–208. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2016.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mankin HJ, Rosenthal DI, Xavier R. Gaucher disease: new approaches to an ancient disease. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001;83:748–762. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Barton NW, Brady RO, Dambrosia JM, et al. Replacement therapy for inherited enzyme deficiency: macrophage-targeted glucocerebrosidase for Gaucher’s disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1464–1470. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199105233242104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Weinreb NJ, Charrow J, Andersson HC, et al. Effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy in 1,028 patients with type 1 Gaucher disease after 2 to 5 years of treatment: a report from the Gaucher Registry. Am J Med. 2002;11:112–119. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01150-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Desnick RJ, Schuchman EH. Enzyme replacement and enhancement therapies: lessons from lysosomal disorders. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:954–966. doi: 10.1038/nrg963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Grabowski GA, Barton NW, Pastores G, et al. Enzyme therapy in Gaucher disease type 1: comparative efficacy of mannose-terminated glucocerebrosidase from natural and recombinant sources. Ann Int Med. 1995;122:33–39. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-1-199501010-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jmoudiak M, Futerman AH. Gaucher disease: pathological mechanisms and modern management. Br J Hematol. 2005;129:178–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hollak CE, vom Dahl S, Aerts JM, et al. Force majeure: therapeutic measures in response to restricted supply of imglucerase (Cerezyme) for patients with Gaucher disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2010;44:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2009.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Burrow T, Grabowski GA. Velaglucerase alfa in the treatment of Gaucher disease type 1. Clin Investig (Lond) 2011;1:285–293. doi: 10.4155/cli.10.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pfizer. Pfizer and Protalix BioTherapeutics announce FDA approval of Elelyso (taliglucerase alfa) for the treatment of Gaucher disease. May 1, 2012. [Accessed January 24, 2018]. Available at: http://press.pfizer.com/press-release/pfizer-and-protalix-biotherapeutics-announce-fda-approval-elelysotaliglucerase-alfa-t.
- 26.Zimran A, Brill-Almon E, Chertkoff R, et al. Pivotal trial with plant cell-expressed recombinant glucocerebrosidase, taliglucerase alfa, a novel enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher disease. Blood. 2011;118:5767–5773. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-366955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tekoah Y, Tzaban S, Kizhner T, et al. Glycosylation and functionality of recombinant β-glucocerebrosidase from various production systems. Biosci Rep. 2013;33:e00071. doi: 10.1042/BSR20130081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dwek RA, Butters TD, Platt FM, et al. Targeting glycosylation as a therapeutic approach. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002;1:65–75. doi: 10.1038/nrd708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.van Patten SM, Hughes H, Huff MR, et al. Effect of mannose chain length on targeting glucocerebrosidase enzyme replacement therapy of Gaucher disease. Glycobiology. 2007;17:467–478. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwm008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vpriv (velaglucerase alfa for injection) prescribing information. Lexington, Massachusetts: Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Inc.; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Red Book Online. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Truven Health Analytics; [Accessed January 24, 2018]. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shayman JA. In memoriam: Norman S. Radin (1920–2013) J Lipid Res. 2013;54:1713–1715. doi: 10.1194/jlr.E039131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.DailyMed Zavesca–miglustat capsule. National Library of Medicine; Nov 16, 2017. [Accessed January 24, 2018]. Available at: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=817892d1-ee12-4632-85fc-57ccdf16d7b8. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cerdelga (eliglustat) prescribing information. Waterford, Ireland: Genzyme; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 35.McWachern KA, Fung J, Komarnitsky S, et al. A specific and potent inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthase for substrate inhibition therapy of Gaucher disease. Mol Genet Metab. 2007;91:259–267. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2007.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schiffmann R, Fitzgibbon EJ, Harris C, et al. Randomized controlled trial of miglustat in Gaucher’s disease type 3. Ann Neurol. 2008;64:514–522. doi: 10.1002/ana.21491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Belmatoug N, Burlina A, Giraldo P, et al. Gastrointestinal disturbances and their management in milglustat-treated patients. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2011;34:991–1001. doi: 10.1007/s10545-011-9368-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lukina E, Watman N, Dragosky M, et al. Eliglustat, an investigational oral therapy for Gaucher disease type 1: phase 2 trial results after 4 years of treatment. Blood Cell Mol Dis. 2014;53:274–276. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kamath RS, Lukina E, Watman N, et al. Skeletal improvement in patients with Gaucher disease type 1: a phase 2 trial of oral eliglustat. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43:1353–1360. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-1891-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mistry PK, Lukina E, Ben Turkia H, et al. Effect of oral eliglustat on splenomegaly in patients with Gaucher disease type 1: the ENGAGE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313:695–706. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cox TM, Drelichman G, Cravo R, et al. Eliglustat compared with imiglucerase in patients with Gaucher’s disease type 1 stabilized on enzyme replacement therapy: a phase 3, randomized, open-label non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9985):2355–2362. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61841-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.ClinicalTrials.gov. A study of eliglustat tartrate (Genz-112638) in patients with Gaucher disease (ENGAGE). NCT00891202. Mar 3, 2017. [Accessed January 24, 2018]. Available at: www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00891202.
- 43.Shayman JA. Eliglustat tartrate: glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor treatment of type 1 Gaucher disease. Drugs Fut. 2010;35(8):613–620. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shayman JA. The design and clinical development of inhibitors of glycosphingolipids synthesis: will invention be the mother necessity? Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2013;124:46–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cox TM, Drelichman G, Cravo R, et al. Eliglustat maintains long-term clinical stability in patients with Gaucher disease type 1 stabilized on enzyme therapy. Blood. 2017;129:2375–2383. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-12-758409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Misty PK, Lukina E, Ben Turkia H, et al. Outcomes after 18 months of eliglustat therapy in treatment-naïve adults with Gaucher disease type 1: The phase 3 ENGAGE trial. Am J Hematol. 2017;92(11):1170–1176. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.El-Beshlawy A, Tylki-Szymanska A, Vellodi A, et al. Long-term hematological, visceral, and growth outcomes in children with Gaucher disease type treated with imiglucerase in the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry. Mol Gene Metab. 2017;120:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Brady RO. Benefits from unearthing “a biochemical Rosetta Stone”. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(53):41216–41221. doi: 10.1074/jbc.X110.197954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sechi A, Deroma A, Dardis G, et al. Long-term effects of enzyme replacement therapy in an Italian cohort of type 3 Gaucher patients. Mol Genet Metab. 2014;113(3):213–218. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Erdemir G, Ozkan T, Ozgur T, et al. Pediatric Gaucher experience in South Marmara region of Turkey. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2011;22(5):500–504. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2011.0244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kraoua I, Sedel F, Caillaud C, et al. A French experience of type 3 Gaucher disease: phenotyping diversity and neurological outcome of 10 patients. Brain Dev. 2011;33(2):131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2010.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tylki-Szymanska A, Vellodi A, El-Beshlawy A, et al. Neuronopathic Gaucher disease: demographic and clinical features of 131 patients enrolled in the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Neurological Outcomes Subregistry. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010;33:339–346. doi: 10.1007/s10545-009-9009-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Erikson A. Gaucher disease-Norrbottnian type (III). Neuropediatric and neurobiological aspects of clinical patterns and treatment. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. 1986;326:1–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rastogi P, Rao S, Kaur J, et al. Gaucher’s disease with cardiac valve calcification and stenosis: a rare presentation due to homozygous pD409H mutation in a north Indian family. Indian J Pediatr. 2016;83(8):877–878. doi: 10.1007/s12098-015-2025-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ceravolo F, Grisolia M, Sestito S, et al. Combination therapy in a patient with chronic neuronopathic Gaucher disease: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2017;11(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13256-016-1147-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Capablo JL, Franco R, deCabezon AS, et al. Neurological improvement in a type 3 Gaucher disease patient treated with imiglucerase/miglustat combination. Epilepsia. 2007;48:1406–1408. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Goker-Alpan O, Wiggs EA, Eblan MJ, et al. Cognitive outcome in treated patients with chronic neuronopathic Gaucher disease. J Pediatr. 2008;153:89–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shah S, Misri A, Bhat S, et al. Gaucher’s disease type III C: unusual cause of intracardiac calcification. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2008;1:144–146. doi: 10.4103/0974-2069.43883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cox-Brinkman J, Van Breemen MJ, van Maldegem BT, et al. Potential efficacy of enzyme replacement and substrate reduction therapy in three siblings with Gaucher disease type III. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2008;31:745–752. doi: 10.1007/s10545-008-0873-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results: Gaucher disease 3. [Accessed January 24, 2018]. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=Gaucher+disease+3.
- 61.Rappeport JM, Ginns EI. Bone-marrow transplantation in severe Gaucher’s disease. N Engl J Med. 1984;311:84–88. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198407123110203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Tsai P, Lipton JM, Sahdev I, et al. Allogenic bone marrow transplantation in severe Gaucher disease. Pediatr Res. 1992;31:503–507. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199205000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Children’s Gaucher Research Fund. GD2/3 in depth. [Accessed January 24, 2018]. Available at: www.childrensgaucher.org/about-gaucher/gaucher-in-depth.
- 64.Baek RC, Kasperzyk JL, Platt FM, et al. N-butyldeoxygalactonojirimycin reduces brain ganglioside and GM2 content in neonatal Sandhoff disease mice. Neurochem Int. 2008;16(3):1125–1133. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2007.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Guerard N, Morand O, Dingemanse J. Lucerastat, an iminosugar with potential as substrate reduction therapy for glycolipid storage disorders: safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0565-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Butters TD, van den Broek LAGM, Fleet GWJ, et al. Molecular requirements of imino sugars for the selective control of N-linked glycosylation and glycosphingolipid biosynthesis. Tetrahedron Asymmetry. 2000;11(1):113–124. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ridley CM, Thur KE, Shanahan J, et al. Beta glucosidase 2 (GBA2) activity and imino sugar pharmacology. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(36):26052–26066. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.463562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Pawlinski L, Malecki MT, Kiec-Wilk B. The additive effect on the antiepileptic treatment of ambroxol in type 3 Gaucher patient. The early observation. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2018;68:192–193. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2016.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Maegawa GH, Tropak MB, Buttner JD, et al. Identification and characterization of ambroxol as an enzyme enhancement agent for Gaucher disease. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:23502–23516. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.012393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Babajani G, Tropak MB, Mahran DJ, et al. Pharmacological chaperone facilitate the post-ER transport of recombinant N370S mutant β-glucocerebrosidase in plant cells; evidence that N370 is a folding mutant. Mol Genet Metab. 2012;106:323–329. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Narita A, Shirai K, Itamura S, et al. Ambroxol chaperone therapy for neuronopathic Gaucher disease: a pilot study. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016;3(3):200–215. doi: 10.1002/acn3.292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sun Y, Liou B, Xu YH, et al. Gaucher disease: ex vivo and in vivo effects of isofagomine on acid beta-glucosidase variants and substrate levels. J Biol Chem. 2011;287:4275–4287. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.280016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Amicus Therapeutics. Amicus Therapeutics announces preliminary results of phase 2 study with Plicera for Gaucher disease. Oct 2, 2009. [Accessed October 6, 2015]. Available at: http://ir.amicustherapeutics.com/ReleaseDetail.cfm?ReleaseID=413437.
- 74.Yang C, Rahimpour S, Lu J, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors increase glucocerebrosidase activity in Gaucher disease by modulation of molecular chaperones. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:966–971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221046110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lu J, Yang C, Chen M, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors prevent the degradation and restore the activity of glucocerebrosidase in Gaucher disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;18:21200–21205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119181109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Johnstone RW. Histone-deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors: Novel drugs for the treatment of cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002;1(4):287–299. doi: 10.1038/nrd772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Faraco G, Pittelli M, Cavone L, et al. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors reduce the glial inflammatory response in vitro and in vivo. Neurobiol Dis. 2009;36(92):269–279. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Thomas EA. Focal nature of neurological disorders necessitates isotype-selective histone deacetylase inhibitors. Mol Neurobiol. 2009;40(1):33–45. doi: 10.1007/s12035-009-8067-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Bennett LL, Mohan D. Gaucher disease and its treatment options. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47(9):1182–1193. doi: 10.1177/1060028013500469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Bennett LL, Turcotte K. Eliglustat tartrate for the treatment of adults with type 1 Gaucher disease. Drug Design Devel Therapy. 2015;9:4639–4647. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S77760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Pastores GM, Weinreb NJ, Aerts H. Therapeutic goals in the treatment of Gaucher disease. Semin Hematol. 2004;41:4–14. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2004.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
