Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2017 Dec;29(5):1823–1837. doi: 10.1017/S0954579417001420

Table 2.

The unadjusted and adjusted association of perceptions of neighborhood disorder with adolescent psychotic experiences

Model specification Association between perceptions of neighborhood disorder and adolescent psychotic experiences

OR 95% CI P value

Model 1 – Unadjusted 2.52 2.07 – 3.06 <0.001
Model 2 – Adjusted for official neighborhood crime rates 2.39 1.96 – 2.91 <0.001
Model 3 – Adjusted for resident-reported neighborhood disorder 2.43 1.98 – 2.98 <0.001
Model 4 – Adjusted for neighborhood-level SES 2.31 1.87 – 2.86 <0.001
Model 5 – Adjusted for family-level characteristics 2.20 1.79 – 2.70 <0.001
Model 6 – Adjusted for adolescent substance and mood problems 1.94 1.57 – 2.39 <0.001
Model 7 – Adjusted for childhood psychotic symptoms 2.43 2.00 – 2.96 <0.001
Model 8 – Adjusted for all covariates simultaneously 1.62 1.27 – 2.05 <0.001
 Official neighborhood crime rates 1.13 1.01 – 1.26 0.035
 Resident-reported neighborhood disorder 1.08 0.73 – 1.61 0.700
 Neighborhood-level SES 1.02 0.92 – 1.12 0.715
 Family socioeconomic status 1.17 0.99 – 1.39 0.072
 Family psychiatric history 1.27 0.81 – 1.99 0.299
 Maternal psychotic symptoms 1.06 0.92 – 1.21 0.448
 Adolescent marijuana dependence 3.29 2.01 – 5.36 <0.001
 Adolescent alcohol dependence 1.58 1.16 – 2.15 0.004
 Adolescent anxiety 2.56 1.74 – 3.76 <0.001
 Adolescent depression 3.05 2.33 – 3.99 <0.001
 Childhood psychotic symptoms 2.20 1.38 – 3.49 0.001

Note: CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio from ordinal logistic regression; SES, socioeconomic status. Model 1 – the unadjusted association between adolescents’ perceptions of neighborhood disorder and adolescent psychotic experiences. Model 2 – adjusted for official neighborhood crime rates. Model 3 – adjusted for resident-reported neighborhood disorder. Model 4 – adjusted for neighborhood-level SES. Model 5 – adjusted for family-level characteristics (family SES, family psychiatric history, and maternal psychotic symptoms). Model 6 – adjusted for adolescent substance and mood problems (marijuana dependence, alcohol dependence, anxiety, and depression). Model 7 – adjusted for childhood psychotic symptoms at age 12. Model 8 – adjusted simultaneously for all covariates. All analyses account for the non-independence of twin observations.