Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2017 Dec;29(5):1823–1837. doi: 10.1017/S0954579417001420

Table 5.

Fit statistics of sub-models (ACE, AE, CE, E) compared to the saturated univariate model for adolescent psychotic experiences and perceptions of neighborhood disorder

Trait Model ep minus2LL df AIC diffLL diffdf P
Adolescent psychotic experiences Sat 10 2514.245 1630 −745.756 NA NA NA
ACE 5 2520.850 1636 −751.150 6.610 6 0.359
AE 4 2523.643 1637 −750.357 2.793 1 0.095
CE* 4 2521.600 1637 −752.400 0.750 1 0.386
E 3 2583.039 1638 −692.961 62.189 2 3.133-14
Perceptions of neighborhood disorder Sat 10 2048.567 1616 −1183.433 NA NA NA
ACE* 4 2058.314 1622 −1185.686 9.747 6 0.135
AE 3 2064.804 1623 −1181.196 6.490 1 0.011
CE 3 2064.418 1623 −1181.582 6.104 1 0.013
E 2 2236.698 1624 −1011.302 178.384 2 1.848 e-39

Note: Models include Sat = saturated model; ACE = full model testing genetic, common, and unique environmental influences compared to the saturated model; AE = model testing genetic and unique environmental influences compared to the ACE model; CE = model testing common and unique environmental influences compared to the ACE model; E = model testing unique environmental influences compared to the ACE model. ep = estimated parameters; minus2LL = minus two log likelihood; df = degrees of freedom; diff = difference; AIC = Akaike’s Information Criterion (lower values indicate a better fitting model); NA = not applicable;

*

Best fitting model.