Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 11.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Host Microbe. 2018 Apr 11;23(4):458–469.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.03.011

Figure 2. GF mice have impaired lipid absorption and transport compared to SPF mice.

Figure 2

A) Schematic of experimental procedure is shown. Mice were treated for 10 minutes with (A–C) or without (E–G) tyloxapol followed by gavage with [3H]triolein and [14C]cholesterol. B) Radiolabeled lipid absorption was measured in SPF and GF mice that were fed a standard chow diet. C) Radiolabeled lipid absorption was measured in mice that were fed a low fat (LF) or high fat (HF) diet for 4 weeks. D) Schematic of experimental procedure without tyloxapol is shown. E) Radiolabeled lipid absorption was measured in SPF and GF mice fed a standard chow diet. F–G) Radiolabeled lipid was measured in intestinal epithelium or metabolic tissues. See also Figure S2. Data were pooled across 1–3 independent experiments and are shown as means +/− SEM (n= 7–9 B; n=5–11 C; n=5–6 E–G). B, E–G) * p ≤ 0.05 (SPF vs GF). C) * p ≤ 0.05 (LF vs HF), # p ≤ 0.05 (SPF vs GF).