Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 23;13(4):e0196023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196023

Table 2. The correlation matrix of inter-subset for the all MDD patients.

Patient group
(n = 107)
DET
(n = 103)
IDN
(n = 106)
OCL
(n = 106)
TWOB
(n = 107)
GML
(n = 103)
ISL
(n = 107)
SEC
(n = 106)
CPAL
(n = 105)
Composite
(n = 107)
HAMD
(n = 66)
Pearson Correlation 0.000 0.109 -0.339** -0.391** -0.012 -0.195 -0.167 0.037 -0.391**
Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000 0.387 0.006 0.001 0.925 0.117 0.179 0.769 0.001
HAMA
(n = 66)
Pearson Correlation 0.008 0.071 -0.385** -0.392** -0.015 -0.165 -0.163 -0.042 -0.439**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.954 0.574 0.002 0.001 0.906 0.186 0.191 0.744 0.000
MADRS
(n = 66)
Pearson Correlation 0.028 0.061 -0.267* -0.362** -0.097 -0.184 -0.157 0.128 -0.369**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.826 0.630 0.032 0.003 0.455 0.139 0.209 0.314 0.002
QOL
(n = 65)
Pearson Correlation -0.297* -0.128 0.089 0.025 0.082 0.090 0.030 -0.049 -0.028
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.020 0.314 0.485 0.842 0.529 0.477 0.813 0.704 0.828
SASS
(n = 65)
Pearson Correlation -0.112 0.093 -0.129 -0.174 0.126 -0.114 -0.134 0.083 -0.153
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.389 0.465 0.309 0.165 0.331 0.367 0.288 0.520 0.224
CWRT
(n = 67)
Pearson Correlation -0.069 -0.223 0.092 0.046 0.044 0.306* 0.080 -0.218 0.065
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.589 0.072 0.465 0.712 0.734 0.012 0.522 0.081 0.601

*p<0.05,

**p<0.01