Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 23;13(4):e0196023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196023

Table 4. The correlation matrix of inter-subset for the medicated MDD patients.

Medicated group
(n = 71)
DET
(n = 70)
IDN
(n = 70)
OCL
(n = 71)
TWOB
(n = 71)
GML
(n = 69)
ISL
(n = 71)
SEC
(n = 71)
CPAL
(n = 71)
Composite
(n = 71)
HAMD
(n = 37)
Pearson Correlation 0.036 0.036 0-.311 -0.570** 0.151 -0.151 -0.154 -0.016 -0.447**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.837 0.835 0.061 0.000 0.387 0.373 0.363 0.927 0.006
HAMA
(n = 37)
Pearson Correlation -0.009 -0.028 -0.388* -0.545** 0.126 -0.171 -0.096 -0.082 -0.529**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.957 0.869 0.018 0.000 0.471 0.311 0.573 0.630 0.001
MADRS
(n = 37)
Pearson Correlation 0.038 0.020 -0.287 -0.494** 0.099 -0.170 -0.140 0.055 -0.413*
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.824 0.910 0.085 0.002 0.573 0.313 0.408 0.748 0.011
QOL
(n = 36)
Pearson Correlation -0.242 -0.206 0.109 0.242 0.114 0.025 0.114 -0.034 0.077
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.161 0.235 0.527 0.155 0.523 0.886 0.509 0.845 0.655
SASS
(n = 36)
Pearson Correlation -0.089 0.136 -0.219 -0.178 0.183 -0.259 -0.056 0.069 -0.228
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.611 0.434 0.200 0.300 0.301 0.127 0.746 0.688 0.180
CWRT
(n = 38)
Pearson Correlation -0.076 -0.184 0.179 0.028 0.071 0.282 -0.006 -0.082 0.110
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.654 0.275 0.283 0.866 0.679 0.087 0.970 0.623 0.510

*p<0.05,

**p<0.01