Table 1. Baseline characteristics.
Short cycle therapy | Continuous Therapy | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Young people randomised and included | 99 | 100 | 199 |
Male | 57 (58%) | 48 (48%) | 105 (53%) |
Age (years) | 13·7 (11·7–17·7) | 14·4 (12·0–17·5) | 14·1 (11·9–17·6) |
8 to 12 | 38 (38%) | 39 (39%) | 77 (39%) |
13 to 17 | 39 (39%) | 41 (41%) | 80 (40%) |
18 to 24 | 22 (22%) | 20 (20%) | 42 (21%) |
Ethnic origin | |||
Black (African or other) | 58 (59%) | 54 (54%) | 112 (56%) |
White | 24 (24%) | 17 (17%) | 41 (21%) |
Asian | 15 (15%) | 22 (22%) | 37 (19%) |
Other | 2 (2%) | 7 (7%) | 9 (5%) |
Route of infection | |||
Vertical | 90 (91%) | 90 (90%) | 180 (90%) |
Sexual contact | 7 (7%) | 7 (7%) | 14 (7%) |
Unknown/other* | 2 (2%) | 3 (3%) | 5 (3%) |
CDC stage§ | |||
N | 16 (16%) | 10 (10%) | 26 (13%) |
A | 25 (25%) | 25 (25%) | 50 (25%) |
B | 45 (45%) | 43 (43%) | 88 (44%) |
C | 13 (13%) | 21 (21%) | 34 (17%) |
Cumulative ART exposure prior to baseline (years) | 6.2 (3.8–7.9) | 5.9 (4.0–8.4) | 6.1 (3.8–8.4) |
Baseline regimen is the initial ART regimen | 40 (40%) | 42 (42%) | 82 (41%) |
EFV plus: | |||
Zidovudine, lamivudine† | 52 (53%) | 53 (53%) | 105 (53%) |
Tenofovir, lamivudine/ emtricitabine†† | 25 (25%) | 27 (27%) | 52 (26%) |
Abacavir, lamivudine/ emticitabine††† | 22 (22%) | 18 (18%) | 40 (20%) |
Other‡ | 0 (0%) | 2 (2%) | 2 (1%) |
CD4 percentage | 34·5 (29·3–39·0) | 34·0 (29·5–38·1) | 34·0 (29·5–38·5) |
<25% | 5 (5%) | 6 (6%) | 11 (6%) |
≥25% to <40% | 73 (74%) | 76 (76%) | 149 (75%) |
≥40% | 21 (21%) | 18 (18%) | 39 (20%) |
CD4 count (cells/μL) | 722·5 (581·0–965·0) | 747·3 (575·3–972·8) | 735·0 (575·5–967·5) |
≥350–500 | 16 (16%) | 12 (12%) | 28 (14%) |
>500 | 83 (84%) | 88 (88%) | 171 (86%) |
Data are median (IQR) or n (%).
*Three young people acquired HIV through blood products (1 SCT, 2 CT), two had uncertain mode of transmission (1 CT, 1 SCT).
§One young person (CT) with unknown CDC stage at randomisation.
† Categorized as zidovudine-based.
†† Categorized as tenofovir-based.
††† Categorized as abacavir-based.
‡The remaining NRTI backbones in two patients were 1) zidovudine, lamivudine, tenofovir (categorised as tenofovir-based) and 2) didanosine, abacavir (categorised as abacavir-based).