Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Ergon. 2017 Sep 15;67:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.09.002

Table 3.

Effect estimates (95% confidence intervals) from linear mixed effects models of post-shift mean reaction time (milliseconds), N = 44.

Mean reaction time Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c Model 4d
Intercept 2.75 (1.40, 4.09) 2.89 (1.44, 4.35) 2.74 (1.32, 4.16) 2.82 (1.07, 4.58)
WBGTmax −0.03 (−0.05, 0.01) −0.03 (−0.06, 0.01) −0.04 (−0.07, 0.00) −0.03 (−0.07, 0.01)
Pre-shift mean reaction time (ms) 0.65 (0.47, 0.82) 0.63 (0.44, 0.82) 0.61 (0.45, 0.79) 0.62 (0.41, 0.82)
Sleep quality (ref: fairly bad)
 Fairly good 0.10 (−0.18, 0.39) 0.13 (−0.15, 0.40) 0.13 (−0.17, 0.42)
 Very good 0.07 (−0.19, 0.33) 0.07 (−0.18, 0.32) 0.10 (−0.17, 0.36)
Shift duration (hrs) 0.06 (−0.01, 0.12) 0.06 (−0.02, 0.15)
Age 0.00 (−0.01,0.01)
Gender (ref: male)
 Female 0.12 (−0.19, 0.42)
Body mass index (kg/m2) −0.01 (−0.03, 0.02)
a

Adjusted for pre-shift reaction time.

b

Adjusted for pre-shift reaction time and sleep quality.

c

Adjusted for pre-shift reaction time, sleep quality, and shift duration.

d

Adjusted for pre-shift reaction time, sleep quality, shift duration, age, gender, and body mass index.