Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 23;28(8):1169–1178.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.057

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Analysis of Stimulation Patterns during aDBS

(A) During aDBS, stimulation was turned on and off depending on STN beta activity. Therefore, stimulation was applied at different time points in different trials. For 100-ms-long time windows, which were shifted relative to cue onset and response, respectively, trials were marked as “stimulation” and “no stimulation”. This is shown schematically for three consecutive time windows (blue, green, and red rectangles). The number of trials in which stimulation was applied varied depending on task-related changes in beta power (see STAR Methods), but throughout all time windows, the % trials with stimulation turned on ranged between 35% and 45% on average (right panel). Dotted lines indicate median % trials on stimulation over time.

(B) Stimulation significantly decreased the extent to which participants slowed down responses depending on task difficulty (negative values indicate that the effect of coherence was lower during stimulation versus no stimulation) in a distinct time window 400–500 ms postcue, but not in other time windows. Mean ± SEM in ms is shown in the left panel and absolute Z scores (mean/SD) in the right panel. Note that the effect of stimulation in each given time window is compared against trials in which stimulation could occur in any other time window. The statistical threshold for each time window was set to Z = 2.24 to correct for the four separate tests, and correction for multiple time windows was conducted using cluster-based permutation tests. An uncorrected threshold of Z = 1.65 is shown for illustration purposes. Shaded areas represent SEM.

(C) Changes in effect of coherence during 400–500 ms postcue stimulation shown for individual patients. For remaining tests (effect of instruction and response-aligned windows), see Figure S3.

See also Figure S2 and Table S2.