(
A) IMQ is a lower intensity stimulus than AITC. Application of 100 μM IMQ elicited a lower maximal ΔF/F response than application of 50 μM AITC in IMQ+/AITC+ TG neurons in 3dpf larval zebrafish. (
B) In an effort to ensure that our analyses in
Figure 4D were accurate reflections of neuronal activity, we also examined the average ΔF/F across the stimulus period. We found that IMQ+/AITC+ cells exhibited a significantly higher average fluorescence change across the entire 50 μM AITC stimulus period than AITC + only responding neurons. (
C) Sequential application of 100 μM IMQ, 10 μM AITC, and 50 μM AITC revealed that IMQ+ neurons (
n = 4) were only found in a subset of neurons that responded to 10 μM AITC (
n = 11), which themselves were included in a larger population of 50 μM AITC+ neurons (
n = 42). 50 μM AITC results were consistent with previous experiments. (
D) Swimming velocity in adult zebrafish also varied as a function of stimulus intensity. Fish that were injected with 100 μM IMQ (
n = 13) exhibited a significant increase in swimming velocity as compared to fish injected with 1% DMSO vehicle (
n = 11). Fish injected with 10 μM AITC (
n = 15) and 200 μM IMQ (
n = 6) exhibited significant reductions in swimming velocity as compared to vehicle-injected controls, suggesting that these stimuli at these particular concentrations are effectually algogenic. 5 μM AITC evoked no significant change in swimming velocity (
n = 12). ΔF/F (fluorescence intensity change) is calculated as the percent change over baseline fluorescence. Bars are expressed as means ± s.e.m. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, Student’s
t-test (
A, B), one-way ANOVA (
D). (
E) Representative traces of adult behavior.