Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;131(5):891–898. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002463

Table 2.

Comparison of Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes Between the Historical and Intervention Cohorts.

Outcome Full unadjusted cohorts
Propensity-matched cohorts
Historical
(N=184)
Intervention
(N=89)
p-value* Historical
(N=80)
Intervention
(N=80)
p-value*
Intraoperative transfusion rate 70 (38.0%) 14 (15.7%) <0.001 28 (35.0%) 12 (15.0%) 0.004
Postoperative transfusion rate 16 (8.7%) 4 (4.5%) 0.21 3 (3.8%) 3 (3.8%) 1.00
Perioperative transfusion rate 76 (41.3%) 16 (18.0%) <0.001 29 (36.2%) 13 (16.2%) 0.004
Estimated blood loss (mL), Median (IQR) 500 (250, 800) 300 (200, 600) 0.009 450 (250, 750) 300 (200, 500) 0.021
Operative time (min), Mean (SD) 279.3 (118.6) 241.7 (105.6) 0.01 264.6 (116.4) 234.4 (105.9) 0.09
Length of stay (days), Median (IQR) 4 (3, 6) 4 (3, 6) 0.87 4 (3, 6) 4 (3, 6) 0.66
Postoperative complications within 30 days
 Venous thromboembolism 3 (1.6%) 1 (1.1%) 1.00 1 (1.2%) 1 (1.2%) 1.00
 Readmission 23 (12.5%) 1 (1.1%) 0.002 6 (7.5%) 1 (1.2%) 0.12
 Reoperation 8 (4.3%) 0 0.057 2 (2.5%) 0 0.50
 Infection - Pulmonary 6 (3.3%) 2 (2.2%) 1.00 3 (3.8%) 1 (1.2%) 0.62
 Infection - Sepsis 8 (4.3%) 0 0.057 1 (1.2%) 0 1.00
 Infection – Wound or pelvic abscess 11 (6.0%) 4 (4.5%) 0.78 2 (2.5%) 4 (5.0%) 0.68
 Unplanned Intensive Care Unit admit 6 (3.3%) 0 0.18 3 (3.8%) 0 0.25
 Other 3 (1.6%) 0 0.55 1 (1.2%) 0 1.00

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation.

*

Comparisons between groups were evaluated using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for nominal variables, the two-sample t-t-est for operative time, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for estimated blood less and length of stay.

Three patients in the historical cohort had a postop anastomosis leak (n=1), postop perforation and anastomosis leak (n=1), and a small bowel obstruction (n=1), respectively.