Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Oct 6;27(7):512–520. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006761

Table 3.

Comparing Admission Medication History (AMH) Error and Admission Medication Order (AMO) Error Rates Across Study Arms

Result Usual Care minus Pharmacist (n = 95, 94) Pharmacist minus Pharmacist-Supervised Pharmacy Technician (n = 94, 89) Usual Care minus Pharmacist-Supervised Pharmacy Technician (n = 95, 89)
Mean AMH error outcomes Δ* pSD C Δ pSD C Δ pSD C
 AMH errors per patient 6.6§ 4.2 1.6 −0.08 2.0 −0.04 6.5§ 4.2 1.5
 AMH errors per patient, severe or life-threatening only 3.8§ 2.9 1.4 0.04 1.5 0.03 3.8§ 2.8 1.4
 AMH error score per patient** 18.8§ 12.4 1.5 0.05 6.8 0.01 18.9§ 12.4 1.5
Mean AMO error outcomes
 AMO errors per patient 2.5§ 2.2 1.2 −0.002 1.1 −0.002 2.5§ 2.2 1.2
 AMO errors per patient, severe or life-threatening only 0.92§ 1.2 0.76 0.10 0.55 0.17 1.0§ 1.2 0.85
 AMO error score per patient 5.4§ 5.5 0.99 0.29 2.7 0.11 5.7§ 5.4 1.1
*

Δ: Difference in means

pSD: pooled standard deviation

C: Cohen’s D calculated as difference in means divided by pooled standard deviation of the two groups

§

p < 0.0001 (pairwise comparison with Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple testing)

**

Primary outcome