Table 3.
Characteristics of the nine IgM anti-HEV positive specimens concordant across all three vendors.
| IgG S/CO | IgM S/CO | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sample | DSI | MP | Wantai | DSI | MP | Wantai | Age | Gender | State |
| 1 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 3.03 | 4.61 | 1.42 | 18 | M | KY |
| 2 | 0.83 | 8.27 | 0.34 | 6.28 | 3.23 | 5.70 | 74 | M | MO |
| 3 | 6.28 | 8.99 | 14.14 | 1.73 | 1.13 | 2.31 | 68 | M | MO |
| 4 | 5.45 | 6.40 | 10.00 | 2.88 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 59 | F | MO |
| 5 | 5.18 | 9.00 | 16.60 | 3.33 | 1.44 | 1.12 | 47 | M | KY |
| 6 | 6.40 | 8.98 | 17.27 | 4.27 | 1.99 | 1.38 | 68 | M | MO |
| 7 | 5.51 | 8.44 | 14.34 | 4.66 | 2.31 | 7.30 | 81 | F | MO |
| 8 | 5.12 | 8.91 | 16.42 | 5.41 | 2.44 | 1.27 | 57 | F | KY |
| 9 | 2.29 | 8.91 | 6.33 | 7.84 | 5.09 | 2.65 | 63 | M | MO |
S/CO, signal/cutoff; age in years; State, KY – Kentucky, MO – Missouri. Samples 3 to 9 are concordant for IgG and IgM across all three vendors.