Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 23;8:6394. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24748-7

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Verification of the possible biochemical candidates. (A) ELISA quantification of the possible biochemical candidates’ expression in normal and cancer cells revealed that NCI-H460 expressed more CLU, SRGN and TGFβ2 than 16HBE. (B) Quantitation of bacterial chemotaxis of the possible candidates. CLU, SRGN and TGFβ2 were tested as biochemical candidates that attracted E. coli towards NCI-H460. Clear preference was observed for CLU against control, but no significant chemotaxis was noticed for SRGN and TGFβ2. The n = 9 represents 9 biological replicates, the error bars represent the standard deviation of means, and a difference of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.